One decade of comparative molecular carcinogenesis.

T L Goodrow
{"title":"One decade of comparative molecular carcinogenesis.","authors":"T L Goodrow","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of comparative carcinogenesis has expanded greatly during the last decade. During this decade, the advent of molecular biology techniques allowed the isolation and identification of several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Analysis of genetic alterations in these genes enabled the first dissection and comparison of carcinogenesis pathways in humans and rodents at the molecular level. The results showed that most of the oncogenes-/tumor suppressor genes found to be altered in humans were also altered in rodents. Even the molecular pathways involved in carcinogenesis appear to be similar in some organs. Unfortunately, there are still many unknown steps in the process of carcinogenesis. However, overall, the results still indicate that in spite of the differences between rodents and humans, the use and comparison of rodent models with human tumorigenesis is one of the best ways to 1) examine the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, 2) to identify potential carcinogenic compounds, and 3) to help determine potential carcinogenic risk for humans. The potential validity of the comparative carcinogenesis approach should become even more valuable as it becomes more fine-tuned due to the application of new approaches and the identification of new genes for study. The rapid pace of genomic mapping, the use of loss of heterozygosity studies, and the use of genetically susceptible populations (rodents and humans) has and will continue to allow the localization, isolation, and identification of new cancer genes. As each gene is analyzed in human and rodent tumors, the molecular pathway comparisons will become more accurate and detailed. This combined with molecular epidemiological and transgenic approaches will assure that the field of comparative carcinogenesis will continue to grow and be important in the next decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":20686,"journal":{"name":"Progress in clinical and biological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in clinical and biological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of comparative carcinogenesis has expanded greatly during the last decade. During this decade, the advent of molecular biology techniques allowed the isolation and identification of several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Analysis of genetic alterations in these genes enabled the first dissection and comparison of carcinogenesis pathways in humans and rodents at the molecular level. The results showed that most of the oncogenes-/tumor suppressor genes found to be altered in humans were also altered in rodents. Even the molecular pathways involved in carcinogenesis appear to be similar in some organs. Unfortunately, there are still many unknown steps in the process of carcinogenesis. However, overall, the results still indicate that in spite of the differences between rodents and humans, the use and comparison of rodent models with human tumorigenesis is one of the best ways to 1) examine the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, 2) to identify potential carcinogenic compounds, and 3) to help determine potential carcinogenic risk for humans. The potential validity of the comparative carcinogenesis approach should become even more valuable as it becomes more fine-tuned due to the application of new approaches and the identification of new genes for study. The rapid pace of genomic mapping, the use of loss of heterozygosity studies, and the use of genetically susceptible populations (rodents and humans) has and will continue to allow the localization, isolation, and identification of new cancer genes. As each gene is analyzed in human and rodent tumors, the molecular pathway comparisons will become more accurate and detailed. This combined with molecular epidemiological and transgenic approaches will assure that the field of comparative carcinogenesis will continue to grow and be important in the next decade.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十年比较分子癌变。
比较癌变的研究领域在过去十年中有了很大的发展。在这十年中,分子生物学技术的出现使得分离和鉴定几种致癌基因和肿瘤抑制基因成为可能。对这些基因的遗传改变的分析使人类和啮齿动物在分子水平上的致癌途径的首次解剖和比较成为可能。结果表明,在人类中发现的大多数致癌基因/肿瘤抑制基因在啮齿动物中也发生了改变。甚至在某些器官中,致癌的分子途径似乎也是相似的。不幸的是,在癌变过程中仍有许多未知的步骤。然而,总体而言,结果仍然表明,尽管啮齿动物和人类之间存在差异,但使用和比较啮齿动物模型与人类肿瘤发生是1)检查致癌机制,2)识别潜在致癌化合物,3)帮助确定人类潜在致癌风险的最佳方法之一。由于新方法的应用和新基因的鉴定,比较致癌方法的潜在有效性将变得更加有价值。基因组图谱的快速发展、杂合性缺失研究的使用以及遗传易感人群(啮齿动物和人类)的使用已经并将继续允许定位、分离和鉴定新的癌症基因。随着人类和啮齿动物肿瘤中每个基因的分析,分子途径的比较将变得更加准确和详细。这与分子流行病学和转基因方法相结合,将确保比较癌变领域将继续发展,并在未来十年发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leukoregulin. Phagocytosis. Radical prostatectomy. Hepatitis A virus. Electrostatic interactions in proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1