Microphone sensitivity as a source of variation in nasalance scores.

D J Zajac, R Lutz, R Mayo
{"title":"Microphone sensitivity as a source of variation in nasalance scores.","authors":"D J Zajac,&nbsp;R Lutz,&nbsp;R Mayo","doi":"10.1044/jshr.3906.1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A two-part study was conducted to determine the sources of variation in nasalance scores derived from the Nasometer. In Study #1, a function generator was used as a signal source to calibrate and input sine and square waves directly into the Nasometer. Ten stimuli ranging from 105 to 330 Hz in 25 Hz increments were evaluated. In Study #2, the same signal source and an amplified loudspeaker were used to calibrate and present square waves to the nasometer via five different sets of microphones. The sound pressure level of all stimuli was maintained at 88 dB. Each microphone set was calibrated using the 105 Hz signals. Results from Study #1 indicated consistent nasalance scores across all frequencies (i.e., all scores were within 2% of calibration). Results from Study #2 demonstrated deviations greater than 2% from calibration as a function of frequency for all five sets of microphones. The smallest deviation was 5%, whereas the largest deviation was 14%. We suggest that the variation in nasalance as a function of stimulus frequency may be due to a mismatch in the sensitivity of microphones (i.e., different frequency response characteristics). It is further suggested (a) that individual investigators determine the response characteristics of their microphones and (b) that relatively small variations in nasalance scores (i.e., 5-14%) either within or across speakers be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":76022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech and hearing research","volume":"39 6","pages":"1228-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech and hearing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3906.1228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

A two-part study was conducted to determine the sources of variation in nasalance scores derived from the Nasometer. In Study #1, a function generator was used as a signal source to calibrate and input sine and square waves directly into the Nasometer. Ten stimuli ranging from 105 to 330 Hz in 25 Hz increments were evaluated. In Study #2, the same signal source and an amplified loudspeaker were used to calibrate and present square waves to the nasometer via five different sets of microphones. The sound pressure level of all stimuli was maintained at 88 dB. Each microphone set was calibrated using the 105 Hz signals. Results from Study #1 indicated consistent nasalance scores across all frequencies (i.e., all scores were within 2% of calibration). Results from Study #2 demonstrated deviations greater than 2% from calibration as a function of frequency for all five sets of microphones. The smallest deviation was 5%, whereas the largest deviation was 14%. We suggest that the variation in nasalance as a function of stimulus frequency may be due to a mismatch in the sensitivity of microphones (i.e., different frequency response characteristics). It is further suggested (a) that individual investigators determine the response characteristics of their microphones and (b) that relatively small variations in nasalance scores (i.e., 5-14%) either within or across speakers be interpreted with caution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麦克风灵敏度作为鼻音平衡分数变化的来源。
一项由两部分组成的研究被用于确定由鼻量计得出的鼻平衡评分变异的来源。在研究#1中,使用函数发生器作为信号源来校准正弦波和方波,并将其直接输入到Nasometer中。以25 Hz的增量评估10个105 - 330 Hz的刺激。在研究#2中,使用相同的信号源和一个放大扬声器来校准,并通过五组不同的麦克风将方波呈现给鼻计。所有刺激声压级均维持在88 dB。每个麦克风组使用105 Hz信号进行校准。研究1的结果表明,所有频率的鼻平衡评分一致(即,所有评分都在校准的2%以内)。研究#2的结果表明,所有五组麦克风的校准偏差都大于2%,作为频率的函数。最小偏差为5%,最大偏差为14%。我们认为,鼻平衡的变化作为刺激频率的函数可能是由于麦克风灵敏度的不匹配(即不同的频率响应特性)。进一步建议(a)个别调查人员确定其麦克风的响应特性,(b)在扬声器内部或扬声器之间的相对较小的鼻平衡分数变化(即5-14%)应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rapid Laser Probing Method Facilitates the Non-invasive and Contact-free Determination of Leaf Thermal Properties. Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. Establishing the validity of recovery from stuttering without formal treatment. Role of F0 and amplitude in the perception of intervocalic glottal stops. Tactile perception of spatial stimuli on the lip surface by young and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1