Non-random associations between fears, beliefs and behaviors among panic patients.

Anxiety Pub Date : 1996-01-01
H Middleton
{"title":"Non-random associations between fears, beliefs and behaviors among panic patients.","authors":"H Middleton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-report questionnaires have been used to compare panic patients' fears, anxious thoughts and behaviors with those of a group of controls. Individual items revealed significant differences between groups in all three areas: factor analysis revealed group differences in the pattern of intraquestionnaire associations between items. Correlational analysis of factor scores revealed significant group differences in the pattern of interquestionnaire associations. These findings only partly support a formulation of panic based upon \"catastrophic interpretations.\" On the other hand, they do provide evidence of cognitive rigidity among panic patients which can be interpreted as evidence of impaired effortful processing when anxious.</p>","PeriodicalId":79474,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety","volume":"2 6","pages":"265-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-report questionnaires have been used to compare panic patients' fears, anxious thoughts and behaviors with those of a group of controls. Individual items revealed significant differences between groups in all three areas: factor analysis revealed group differences in the pattern of intraquestionnaire associations between items. Correlational analysis of factor scores revealed significant group differences in the pattern of interquestionnaire associations. These findings only partly support a formulation of panic based upon "catastrophic interpretations." On the other hand, they do provide evidence of cognitive rigidity among panic patients which can be interpreted as evidence of impaired effortful processing when anxious.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恐慌患者的恐惧、信念和行为之间的非随机关联。
自我报告问卷被用来比较恐慌患者的恐惧,焦虑的想法和行为与一组对照组的人。个别项目揭示了各组之间在所有三个方面的显著差异:因素分析揭示了各组之间问卷内项目之间关联模式的差异。因子得分相关分析显示,问卷间关联模式组间差异显著。这些发现只是部分支持基于“灾难性解释”的恐慌表述。另一方面,它们确实提供了恐慌患者认知僵化的证据,这可以解释为焦虑时努力处理受损的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freud and the Three Anxieties From Kant to Hegel via Philippe Pinel The Universality of Emotions? The New Philosophy Emmanuel Levinas and the Anxiety of Intersubjective Origins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1