[Decision-making style among hemodialysis patients].

I Kajimoto, Y Hino, S Matsumoto, Y Miyatake, S Nojima
{"title":"[Decision-making style among hemodialysis patients].","authors":"I Kajimoto,&nbsp;Y Hino,&nbsp;S Matsumoto,&nbsp;Y Miyatake,&nbsp;S Nojima","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76067,"journal":{"name":"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research","volume":"30 2","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach.

Result: Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support.

Discussion: The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[血液透析患者的决策方式]。
未标记:本描述性研究的目的是确定透析患者的决策风格。受试者是同意参加本研究的血液透析患者的方便样本。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的。采访被录在磁带上并进行转录。决策情节由搜索者挑选和解释。采用归纳法对数据进行分析。结果:研究对象为来自4家医院的21例患者。平均年龄为51.1岁,开始血液透析后的平均持续时间为9.1年。确定了16种决策风格:接受、坚定、辞职、妥协、坚持、挑战、自我激活、追星族、危机回避、退缩、谨慎、保留、逃避、拒绝、教条、委托。这16种决策风格具有现实导向感知、建设性机制、高质量社会支持的特点。另一方面,被动型决策风格表现为认知扭曲、制度被动、社会支持不足。讨论:现实取向、精力、开放性、价值体系是影响血液透析患者决策方式的关键因素。讨论了支持患者做出决定的护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Research methodologies]. Mixed Methods in Nursing Research : An Overview and Practical Examples. [Chronic disease self-management: a model for tertiary prevention]. [Proposals and future objectives of health promotion in Japan: the activities of the Standford Center for Research in Disease Prevention]. [Smoking cessation counseling in Japan].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1