Respiratory Allergenicity of Detergent Enzymes in the Guinea Pig Intratracheal Test: Association with Sensitization of Occupationally Exposed Individuals

Katherine Sarlo, E.Robert Fletcher, William G. Gaines , Harry L. Ritz
{"title":"Respiratory Allergenicity of Detergent Enzymes in the Guinea Pig Intratracheal Test: Association with Sensitization of Occupationally Exposed Individuals","authors":"Katherine Sarlo,&nbsp;E.Robert Fletcher,&nbsp;William G. Gaines ,&nbsp;Harry L. Ritz","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A guinea pig intratracheal test was used to set occupational operating guidelines for new enzyme proteins used in the detergent industry. In these studies, animals were intratracheally dosed with different levels of enzyme protein and sera from the animals were titered for allergic antibody to the enzyme. The amount of antibody produced to an enzyme was compared to the amount of antibody produced to the same protein doses of Alcalase, for which effective operating guidelines exist. These comparisons were used to determine if a new enzyme was more potent, less potent, or equivalent to Alcalase; operating guidelines were then established for the new enzyme. Termamyl was about 10-fold more potent than Alcalase and the protease subtilisin B was shown to be less potent. Another protease, Savinase, was shown to be equivalent in potency to Alcalase. The operating guidelines for Termamyl were adjusted lower, whereas the operating guidelines for the proteases were set the same as that of Alcalase. Under these conditions, we would predict that sensitizations to new enzymes would be comparable to or lower than the sensitizations to Alcalase. Prospective evaluation of skin prick test data of factory workers showed that sensitizations to Termamyl and Savinase were similar to sensitizations to Alcalase. The sensitizations to subtilisin B were lower than those to Alcalase. During this time period (7 years), only three respiratory incidents (rhinitis) were reported, demonstrating that employees with positive skin prick tests can continue to work. These comparisons indicate that the guinea pig intratracheal test is a good animal model for evaluating enzymes as respiratory allergens and that the data generated can be used to set operating guidelines for occupational allergens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"39 1","pages":"Pages 44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2356","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A guinea pig intratracheal test was used to set occupational operating guidelines for new enzyme proteins used in the detergent industry. In these studies, animals were intratracheally dosed with different levels of enzyme protein and sera from the animals were titered for allergic antibody to the enzyme. The amount of antibody produced to an enzyme was compared to the amount of antibody produced to the same protein doses of Alcalase, for which effective operating guidelines exist. These comparisons were used to determine if a new enzyme was more potent, less potent, or equivalent to Alcalase; operating guidelines were then established for the new enzyme. Termamyl was about 10-fold more potent than Alcalase and the protease subtilisin B was shown to be less potent. Another protease, Savinase, was shown to be equivalent in potency to Alcalase. The operating guidelines for Termamyl were adjusted lower, whereas the operating guidelines for the proteases were set the same as that of Alcalase. Under these conditions, we would predict that sensitizations to new enzymes would be comparable to or lower than the sensitizations to Alcalase. Prospective evaluation of skin prick test data of factory workers showed that sensitizations to Termamyl and Savinase were similar to sensitizations to Alcalase. The sensitizations to subtilisin B were lower than those to Alcalase. During this time period (7 years), only three respiratory incidents (rhinitis) were reported, demonstrating that employees with positive skin prick tests can continue to work. These comparisons indicate that the guinea pig intratracheal test is a good animal model for evaluating enzymes as respiratory allergens and that the data generated can be used to set operating guidelines for occupational allergens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豚鼠气管内试验中洗涤剂酶的呼吸道致敏性:与职业暴露个体致敏性的关系
用豚鼠气管内试验为洗涤剂工业中使用的新酶蛋白制定了职业操作指南。在这些研究中,给动物气管内注射不同水平的酶蛋白,并对动物的血清进行酶过敏抗体滴度检测。对一种酶产生的抗体量与对相同蛋白质剂量的Alcalase产生的抗体量进行比较,存在有效的操作指南。这些比较被用来确定一种新的酶是否更有效,更弱,或相当于Alcalase;然后建立了新酶的操作指南。Termamyl的效力大约是Alcalase的10倍,而蛋白酶枯草蛋白酶B的效力较弱。另一种蛋白酶,Savinase,被证明在效力上与Alcalase相当。Termamyl的操作指南调整较低,而蛋白酶的操作指南设置与Alcalase相同。在这些条件下,我们可以预测对新酶的敏化将与对Alcalase的敏化相当或更低。对工厂工人皮肤点刺试验数据的前瞻性评价表明,对Termamyl和Savinase的致敏性与对Alcalase的致敏性相似。枯草杆菌素B的致敏性低于Alcalase。在此期间(7年),仅报告了3起呼吸道事件(鼻炎),这表明皮肤点刺试验呈阳性的员工可以继续工作。这些比较表明,豚鼠气管内试验是评估酶作为呼吸道过敏原的良好动物模型,所产生的数据可用于制定职业性过敏原的操作指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rat Olfactory Mucosa Displays a High Activity in Metabolizing Methyltert-butyl Ether and Other Gasoline Ethers Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects Differences in Caffeine 3-Demethylation Activity among Inbred Mouse Strains: A Comparison of HepaticCyp1a2Gene Expression between Two Inbred Strains Ketoconazole Impairs Early Pregnancy and the Decidual Cell Response via Alterations in Ovarian Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1