The effect of surgical ICU triage patterns on differing severity adjusted outcomes in France and the United States.

T J Kearney, M M Shabot, M LoBue, B J Leyerle
{"title":"The effect of surgical ICU triage patterns on differing severity adjusted outcomes in France and the United States.","authors":"T J Kearney,&nbsp;M M Shabot,&nbsp;M LoBue,&nbsp;B J Leyerle","doi":"10.1007/BF03356581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical patients treated in French intensive care units (ICU's) appear to have higher mortality rates than patients in the United States. We hypothesized that this may be due to the French practice of not transferring dying patients from the ICU. We wished to determine if the different mortality rates could be explained by transfer practices for dying patients or other factors such as severity of illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Flowsheet data for 6,787 consecutive surgical ICU (SICU) patients from our institution over a 31 month period was entered into an ICU Clinical Information System which calculated the Day 1 Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) for each patient upon admission to the SICU. SICU and overall hospital mortality data were matched with severity data and the complete data set was analyzed against results for 2,604 surgical patients in French ICU's. Since terminally ill patients in France are not transferred to floor care, we also compared the French ICU mortality rate with both our SICU mortality rate and combined SICU and surgical floor mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our overall SICU mortality was 1.7% and our combined SICU and hospital mortality was 4.2%, while the French ICU mortality was 14.1%. The French ICU's had more patients with higher severity of illness as measured by SAPS. When the effects of ICU transfer practices and severity of illness were considered, there were no mortality differences seen among patients admitted to the different units after elective surgery. Significant differences in mortality were seen when patients admitted emergently were studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differences in severity adjusted ICU mortality between French ICU's and our SICU are explained by different triage practices for terminally ill patients following elective ICU admission. These triage differences do not fully explain the mortality differences seen among patients emergently admitted to the ICU. Other factors such as the presence of trauma, ICU staffing practices, patient mix or other unidentified factors may be responsible for the severity adjusted differences in mortality among emergency surgical ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"14 2","pages":"83-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03356581","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical patients treated in French intensive care units (ICU's) appear to have higher mortality rates than patients in the United States. We hypothesized that this may be due to the French practice of not transferring dying patients from the ICU. We wished to determine if the different mortality rates could be explained by transfer practices for dying patients or other factors such as severity of illness.

Methods: Flowsheet data for 6,787 consecutive surgical ICU (SICU) patients from our institution over a 31 month period was entered into an ICU Clinical Information System which calculated the Day 1 Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) for each patient upon admission to the SICU. SICU and overall hospital mortality data were matched with severity data and the complete data set was analyzed against results for 2,604 surgical patients in French ICU's. Since terminally ill patients in France are not transferred to floor care, we also compared the French ICU mortality rate with both our SICU mortality rate and combined SICU and surgical floor mortality rates.

Results: Our overall SICU mortality was 1.7% and our combined SICU and hospital mortality was 4.2%, while the French ICU mortality was 14.1%. The French ICU's had more patients with higher severity of illness as measured by SAPS. When the effects of ICU transfer practices and severity of illness were considered, there were no mortality differences seen among patients admitted to the different units after elective surgery. Significant differences in mortality were seen when patients admitted emergently were studied.

Conclusions: The differences in severity adjusted ICU mortality between French ICU's and our SICU are explained by different triage practices for terminally ill patients following elective ICU admission. These triage differences do not fully explain the mortality differences seen among patients emergently admitted to the ICU. Other factors such as the presence of trauma, ICU staffing practices, patient mix or other unidentified factors may be responsible for the severity adjusted differences in mortality among emergency surgical ICU patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科ICU分诊模式对法国和美国不同严重程度调整结果的影响。
简介:在法国重症监护病房(ICU)治疗的外科患者似乎比在美国的患者死亡率更高。我们假设这可能是由于法国不将垂死病人从ICU转移的做法。我们希望确定不同的死亡率是否可以用临终病人的转院做法或其他因素(如疾病的严重程度)来解释。方法:将我院连续6787例外科ICU (SICU)患者31个月的流程数据输入ICU临床信息系统,计算每位患者入院后第1天的简化急性生理评分(SAPS)。SICU和整体医院死亡率数据与严重程度数据相匹配,并将完整数据集与法国ICU 2,604例手术患者的结果进行分析。由于法国的绝症患者没有转移到地板护理,我们还比较了法国ICU的死亡率与我们的SICU死亡率以及SICU和手术地板的综合死亡率。结果:我们SICU的总死亡率为1.7%,SICU和医院的综合死亡率为4.2%,而法国ICU的死亡率为14.1%。根据SAPS的测量,法国ICU的患者病情严重程度更高。当考虑到ICU转移实践和疾病严重程度的影响时,择期手术后入住不同单位的患者之间没有死亡率差异。对急诊入院的患者进行研究时,死亡率有显著差异。结论:法国ICU和我们SICU重症调整死亡率的差异可以解释为选择ICU住院的绝症患者的不同分诊做法。这些分诊的差异并不能完全解释急诊ICU患者死亡率的差异。其他因素,如创伤的存在、ICU人员配置实践、患者组合或其他未知因素可能是急诊外科ICU患者严重程度调整后死亡率差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WCALive: broadcasting a major medical conference on the Internet. The inspiratory to end-tidal oxygen difference during exercise. Design and implementation of a PC-based data acquisition system for measuring ECG and respiratory signals. Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1