Evaluation of the VALAB expert system.

X Fuentes-Arderiu, M J Castiñeiras-Lacambra, M T Panadero-García
{"title":"Evaluation of the VALAB expert system.","authors":"X Fuentes-Arderiu,&nbsp;M J Castiñeiras-Lacambra,&nbsp;M T Panadero-García","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The validation of a clinical laboratory report is a process that guarantees the results contained in the report have been obtained under satisfactory metrological conditions and that they are compatible with the information available on the patient. This validation is generally carried out manually by a clinical laboratory professional, but also may be done by an expert system properly programmed, such as the VALAB system. The evaluation presented in this article consists of comparing human and system decisions of validation for 500 randomly selected clinical laboratory reports from hospitalized patients. In this evaluation, 84.8% of the reports examined by the VALAB are accepted directly without any human aid, and only 15.2% require examination by clinical biochemists.</p>","PeriodicalId":77119,"journal":{"name":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","volume":"35 9","pages":"711-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validation of a clinical laboratory report is a process that guarantees the results contained in the report have been obtained under satisfactory metrological conditions and that they are compatible with the information available on the patient. This validation is generally carried out manually by a clinical laboratory professional, but also may be done by an expert system properly programmed, such as the VALAB system. The evaluation presented in this article consists of comparing human and system decisions of validation for 500 randomly selected clinical laboratory reports from hospitalized patients. In this evaluation, 84.8% of the reports examined by the VALAB are accepted directly without any human aid, and only 15.2% require examination by clinical biochemists.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VALAB专家系统的评估。
临床实验室报告的验证是一个过程,保证报告中包含的结果是在令人满意的计量条件下获得的,并且它们与患者的可用信息相一致。该验证通常由临床实验室专业人员手动执行,但也可以由适当编程的专家系统完成,例如VALAB系统。本文提出的评估包括比较500随机选择的住院患者的临床实验室报告的人与系统的决策验证。在本次评估中,VALAB审查的报告中,84.8%的报告直接被接受,没有任何人工帮助,只有15.2%的报告需要临床生物化学家的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and Characterization of Fatty Acid Furfuryl Ester Mixtures: Biodiesel from Furfuryl Alcohol Determination of Agmatine Rate by Spectrofluorimetric Method in Alkaline Medium: Optimization and Application on Shrimp. Increased Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress in Common Metabolic Diseases in Gaziantep Region nvironmental Monitoring of NOX, Total Oxidants and the Implications for Photochemistry of Air Pollution over Ilorin Shed, Nigeria Short Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1