An alternative analysis for crossover studies that accounts for between-group disparities in drug response.

T J Cleophas
{"title":"An alternative analysis for crossover studies that accounts for between-group disparities in drug response.","authors":"T J Cleophas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In crossover clinical trials comparing completely different treatments, patients tend to fall into different populations: those who respond better to treatment 1 and those who respond better to treatment 2. The correlation between treatment response in such trials is negative. The current ANCOVA analysis for crossover studies does not allow for correlations being negative, and is therefore not adequate for testing in this kind of trials.</p><p><strong>Objective of study: </strong>To study whether matrix algebra provides a more appropriate approach for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Using a mathematical model as well as hypothesized examples, it is demonstrated that matrix algebra of 2 pairs of cells of the same order not only allows for negative correlations in a crossover design but also provides enough power to test both the treatment and carryover effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":77119,"journal":{"name":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","volume":"35 10","pages":"775-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In crossover clinical trials comparing completely different treatments, patients tend to fall into different populations: those who respond better to treatment 1 and those who respond better to treatment 2. The correlation between treatment response in such trials is negative. The current ANCOVA analysis for crossover studies does not allow for correlations being negative, and is therefore not adequate for testing in this kind of trials.

Objective of study: To study whether matrix algebra provides a more appropriate approach for this purpose.

Results and conclusions: Using a mathematical model as well as hypothesized examples, it is demonstrated that matrix algebra of 2 pairs of cells of the same order not only allows for negative correlations in a crossover design but also provides enough power to test both the treatment and carryover effect.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉研究的另一种分析,解释了药物反应的组间差异。
背景:在比较完全不同治疗方法的交叉临床试验中,患者往往属于不同的人群:对治疗1反应较好的患者和对治疗2反应较好的患者。在这些试验中,治疗反应之间的相关性是负的。目前交叉研究的ANCOVA分析不允许相关性为负,因此不适合在这类试验中进行检验。研究目的:研究矩阵代数是否为这一目的提供了更合适的方法。结果和结论:使用数学模型以及假设的例子,证明了相同顺序的2对细胞的矩阵代数不仅允许交叉设计中的负相关,而且还提供了足够的功率来测试处理和结转效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and Characterization of Fatty Acid Furfuryl Ester Mixtures: Biodiesel from Furfuryl Alcohol Determination of Agmatine Rate by Spectrofluorimetric Method in Alkaline Medium: Optimization and Application on Shrimp. Increased Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress in Common Metabolic Diseases in Gaziantep Region nvironmental Monitoring of NOX, Total Oxidants and the Implications for Photochemistry of Air Pollution over Ilorin Shed, Nigeria Short Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1