[Patients' perception of surgical care. A study at HUCH, Surgical Hospital in 1994 and a comparison of study results from 1990].

Hoitotiede Pub Date : 1997-01-01
M Westman, M Backman
{"title":"[Patients' perception of surgical care. A study at HUCH, Surgical Hospital in 1994 and a comparison of study results from 1990].","authors":"M Westman,&nbsp;M Backman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with care in HUCH, Surgical Hospital 1994 and to compare the results to the results of a-study done with the same questionnaire in 1990. The data were collected using SPRI:s (Sjukvårdens och socialvårdens planerings- och rationaliseringsinsitut) questionnaire from patients (N = 215) at seven wards. The response rate was 72. The structured questions were analysed by using the SOLO calculating program and the open-ended questions by using content analyses method. The results are presented in percentages and cross tabulations in the article. According to the results the patients were elder, suffered from more serious diseases and stayed for a longer time in the hospital than 1990. Patients' satisfaction was improved with information and nursing. However, even if the information was improved, most patients wanted more written information. On the whole, patients were satisfied with nursing care but some criticism was expressed concerning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":77161,"journal":{"name":"Hoitotiede","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hoitotiede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with care in HUCH, Surgical Hospital 1994 and to compare the results to the results of a-study done with the same questionnaire in 1990. The data were collected using SPRI:s (Sjukvårdens och socialvårdens planerings- och rationaliseringsinsitut) questionnaire from patients (N = 215) at seven wards. The response rate was 72. The structured questions were analysed by using the SOLO calculating program and the open-ended questions by using content analyses method. The results are presented in percentages and cross tabulations in the article. According to the results the patients were elder, suffered from more serious diseases and stayed for a longer time in the hospital than 1990. Patients' satisfaction was improved with information and nursing. However, even if the information was improved, most patients wanted more written information. On the whole, patients were satisfied with nursing care but some criticism was expressed concerning environment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对手术护理的感知。1994年外科医院HUCH的一项研究与1990年研究结果的比较]。
本研究的目的是评估1994年外科医院HUCH患者对护理的满意度,并将结果与1990年使用相同问卷进行的研究结果进行比较。数据采用SPRI:s (sjukv - rdens - social - rdens - planerings- orationaliseringsinsite)问卷从7个病房的患者(N = 215)中收集。回复率为72。结构化问题采用SOLO计算程序进行分析,开放式问题采用内容分析法进行分析。结果在文章中以百分比和交叉表格的形式呈现。结果表明,与1990年相比,患者年龄大、病情重、住院时间长。患者满意度通过信息和护理得到提高。然而,即使信息得到了改善,大多数患者还是想要更多的书面信息。总体而言,患者对护理满意,但对环境存在一定的不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Psychological load factors and control in the work of occupational health nurses]. [The work of a midwife-public health nurse in northern Finland in 1950-1987]. [Good nursing care in the postnatal wards--mothers' views on the aspect of nursing care]. Nurse educators' well-being at work in Finland. University of Kuopio and University of Turku. Share a Fulbright professor in 1997-1998.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1