{"title":"Measurement of free triiodothyronine in intensive care patients--comparison of two routine methods.","authors":"M Vogeser, K Jacob","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred sera from intensive care patients, and 93 sera from endocrinological outpatients were used for a comparison between two automated assays for free triiodothyronine (Enzymun Test, and Elecsys 2010, both Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). In outpatients a good correlation between both methods was found (r = 0.932). In contrast, comparability between the two assays was poor in intensive care patients (r = 0.75, after exclusion of two outliers); significantly more values in the hypothyroid range were found with the Elecsys 2010 assay (n = 83, compared with n = 33 with the Enzymun Test; chi 2 test p = 0.001). We conclude that routine measurement of free triiodothyronine which has the theoretical advantage of quantifying the biologically active fraction of thyroid hormones may have methodological limitations in severely ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77119,"journal":{"name":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","volume":"35 11","pages":"873-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One hundred sera from intensive care patients, and 93 sera from endocrinological outpatients were used for a comparison between two automated assays for free triiodothyronine (Enzymun Test, and Elecsys 2010, both Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). In outpatients a good correlation between both methods was found (r = 0.932). In contrast, comparability between the two assays was poor in intensive care patients (r = 0.75, after exclusion of two outliers); significantly more values in the hypothyroid range were found with the Elecsys 2010 assay (n = 83, compared with n = 33 with the Enzymun Test; chi 2 test p = 0.001). We conclude that routine measurement of free triiodothyronine which has the theoretical advantage of quantifying the biologically active fraction of thyroid hormones may have methodological limitations in severely ill patients.