A comparison of active and passive warm ups on energy system contribution and performance in moderate heat.

B O'Brien, W Payne, P Gastin, C Burge
{"title":"A comparison of active and passive warm ups on energy system contribution and performance in moderate heat.","authors":"B O'Brien,&nbsp;W Payne,&nbsp;P Gastin,&nbsp;C Burge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of either an active warm up (AWU) or a passive warm up (PWU) on performance and energy system contribution in a moderately hot ambient environment (30 degrees C, 50% Relative humidity) was investigated. The AWU procedure involved exercise at 100% VO2 max followed by four 30 sec efforts at 100% of VO2 max and the PWU involved the application of heat pads to the quadriceps for 60 min. Following either warm up procedure, (randomized cross over design) a 60 s supramaximal test on a Monark bicycle ergometer was performed. The AWU procedure elicited the greatest average power output (0-30 s: 669 +/- 28 W vs 645 +/- 30 W, p < 0.05) and (0-60 s 529 +/- 20 W vs 513 +/- 20 W, p < 0.05), the greatest peak power output (917 +/- 45 W vs 880 +/- 46 W, p < 0.01) and VO2 peak during the initial 30 s (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01) and over the duration of the 60 s test (3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05). The estimated anaerobic energy release was not significantly different between the trials. The performance benefits of an AWU occurred within the first 30 s of exercise as there was no significant differences in average power output or VO2 peak in the final 30 s of exercise. In conclusion, an AWU enhances sprinting performance in a moderately hot ambient environment, despite a higher rectal temperature than a PWU. The increased power output is derived from greater oxygen consumption in the initial stages of exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":79393,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":"29 4","pages":"106-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of either an active warm up (AWU) or a passive warm up (PWU) on performance and energy system contribution in a moderately hot ambient environment (30 degrees C, 50% Relative humidity) was investigated. The AWU procedure involved exercise at 100% VO2 max followed by four 30 sec efforts at 100% of VO2 max and the PWU involved the application of heat pads to the quadriceps for 60 min. Following either warm up procedure, (randomized cross over design) a 60 s supramaximal test on a Monark bicycle ergometer was performed. The AWU procedure elicited the greatest average power output (0-30 s: 669 +/- 28 W vs 645 +/- 30 W, p < 0.05) and (0-60 s 529 +/- 20 W vs 513 +/- 20 W, p < 0.05), the greatest peak power output (917 +/- 45 W vs 880 +/- 46 W, p < 0.01) and VO2 peak during the initial 30 s (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 1.2 +/- 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01) and over the duration of the 60 s test (3.2 +/- 0.1 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05). The estimated anaerobic energy release was not significantly different between the trials. The performance benefits of an AWU occurred within the first 30 s of exercise as there was no significant differences in average power output or VO2 peak in the final 30 s of exercise. In conclusion, an AWU enhances sprinting performance in a moderately hot ambient environment, despite a higher rectal temperature than a PWU. The increased power output is derived from greater oxygen consumption in the initial stages of exercise.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中热条件下主动和被动预热对能源系统贡献和性能的比较。
研究了在中等高温环境(30℃,50%相对湿度)下,主动预热(AWU)或被动预热(PWU)对性能和能源系统贡献的影响。AWU程序包括在100% VO2 max下进行运动,然后在100% VO2 max下进行4次30秒的运动,PWU包括在股四头肌上应用热垫60分钟。在任何一个热身程序之后,(随机交叉设计)在Monark自行车测力仪上进行60秒的最大测试。原子量单位过程引起的最大平均功率输出(0 30年代:669 + / - 28 W vs 645 + / - 30 W、p < 0.05)和(0-60 s 529 + / - 20 W vs 513 + / - 20 W, p < 0.05),最大峰值功率输出(917 + / - 45 W vs 880 + / - 46 W, p < 0.01)和最大峰值在最初的30年代(1.4 + / - 0.1 vs 1.2 + / - 0.1 l.min-1, p < 0.01), 60年代测试的持续时间(3.2 + / - 0.1 vs 2.9 + / - 0.2 l.min-1, p < 0.05)。估计厌氧能量释放在试验之间没有显著差异。AWU的性能优势出现在运动的前30秒,因为在运动的最后30秒,平均功率输出或VO2峰值没有显着差异。总之,尽管直肠温度比PWU高,但AWU在中等温度的环境中可以提高短跑性能。在运动的最初阶段,增加的能量输出来源于更多的氧气消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences in the incidence of injury between rugby league forwards and backs. Biochemical and ultrastructural indices of muscle damage after a twenty-one kilometre run. Coping with performance slumps: factor analysis of the Ways of Coping in Sport Scale. A comparison of active and passive warm ups on energy system contribution and performance in moderate heat. Creatine supplementation and the total work performed during 15-s and 1-min bouts of maximal cycling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1