[Comparison of gastric emptying, blood glucose, and oro-cecal transit times after a conventional morning meal and a Kollath breakfast].

P Leitzmann, W Heine, K D Wutzke, P von Bismarck, L Dorlöchter, O Miera, M Bührlen, B W Cornelissen, C Höcker
{"title":"[Comparison of gastric emptying, blood glucose, and oro-cecal transit times after a conventional morning meal and a Kollath breakfast].","authors":"P Leitzmann,&nbsp;W Heine,&nbsp;K D Wutzke,&nbsp;P von Bismarck,&nbsp;L Dorlöchter,&nbsp;O Miera,&nbsp;M Bührlen,&nbsp;B W Cornelissen,&nbsp;C Höcker","doi":"10.1007/pl00007370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood glucose kinetics and intestinal transit times were investigated in 12 adult volunteers aged 28 to 52 years after ingestion of a conventional morning meal made up of white flour rolls, butter, marmalade, and coffee with sugar as compared with an isocaloric Kollath-breakfast consisting of whole wheat flakes as a basis. For estimation of gastric emptying time the sodium-[13C]acetate breath test technique was used. Oro-coecal transit time and gastric emptying were determined by simultaneous administration of lactose-[13C]ureide and consecutive drawings of breath samples in intervals of 15, 30, and 60 min through 12 h. The 13CO2-excess of the breath test samples was measured by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The postprandial rise in blood glucose following the ingestion of the Kollath-breakfast was lower as compared with the conventional morning meal, showing significant differences between the 90 min values and the area below the blood glucose curve. The half time of gastric emptying was not different between the two breakfast versions (1.7 vs. 1.6 h). The oro-coecal transit time averaged out at 4.2 h after the Kollath-breakfast and 5.3 h following the conventional morning meal. Likewise, there were no significant differences in the coecal retention time nor in the cumulative percentage of 13CO2-exhalation between the two breakfast versions. Concerning the blood glucose kinetics the differences in the nutritional physiology between the breakfast based on whole wheat flakes and the conventional breakfast as claimed by Kollath were only detectable in outlines in our study. Gastric emptying time showed no differences between the two breakfast versions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23811,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft","volume":"37 1","pages":"31-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/pl00007370","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Blood glucose kinetics and intestinal transit times were investigated in 12 adult volunteers aged 28 to 52 years after ingestion of a conventional morning meal made up of white flour rolls, butter, marmalade, and coffee with sugar as compared with an isocaloric Kollath-breakfast consisting of whole wheat flakes as a basis. For estimation of gastric emptying time the sodium-[13C]acetate breath test technique was used. Oro-coecal transit time and gastric emptying were determined by simultaneous administration of lactose-[13C]ureide and consecutive drawings of breath samples in intervals of 15, 30, and 60 min through 12 h. The 13CO2-excess of the breath test samples was measured by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The postprandial rise in blood glucose following the ingestion of the Kollath-breakfast was lower as compared with the conventional morning meal, showing significant differences between the 90 min values and the area below the blood glucose curve. The half time of gastric emptying was not different between the two breakfast versions (1.7 vs. 1.6 h). The oro-coecal transit time averaged out at 4.2 h after the Kollath-breakfast and 5.3 h following the conventional morning meal. Likewise, there were no significant differences in the coecal retention time nor in the cumulative percentage of 13CO2-exhalation between the two breakfast versions. Concerning the blood glucose kinetics the differences in the nutritional physiology between the breakfast based on whole wheat flakes and the conventional breakfast as claimed by Kollath were only detectable in outlines in our study. Gastric emptying time showed no differences between the two breakfast versions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[常规早餐和Kollath早餐后胃排空、血糖和口盲肠转运时间的比较]。
研究人员对12名年龄在28岁至52岁之间的成年志愿者进行了血糖动力学和肠道运输时间的调查,他们在摄入了由白面粉卷、黄油、果酱和加糖咖啡组成的传统早餐后,与以全麦片为基础的等热量kollah早餐进行了比较。胃排空时间采用醋酸钠呼气试验技术。通过同时给药乳糖-[13C]脲,并在15、30和60分钟至12小时的间隔内连续绘制呼气样本,来测定口腔-结肠传输时间和胃排空。通过连续流同位素比质谱法测量呼气测试样本的13co2过量。与常规早餐相比,食用kollath早餐后的餐后血糖上升较低,90分钟值和血糖曲线下方区域之间存在显着差异。两种早餐版本的胃排空时间没有差异(1.7 h vs. 1.6 h)。胃-肠转运时间平均为早餐后4.2 h和早餐后5.3 h。同样,两种早餐版本在结肠保留时间和13co2呼气累积百分比方面也没有显着差异。关于血糖动力学,在我们的研究中,以全麦片为基础的早餐与Kollath所声称的传统早餐之间的营养生理学差异仅在大纲中可以检测到。胃排空时间在两种早餐版本之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporation of urea nitrogen into fecal protein and plasma protein amino acids in elderly human volunteers after ingestion of lactic acid bacteria. [On the article: Schellhorn et al.: Use of vitamins and minerals as food supplements from the MONICA cross-sectional study of 1994/95 from the Augsburg Study region]. Supplements as a source of micronutrient intake in middle-aged men in southern Germany: results of the MONICA dietary survey 1994/95. [Carotenoid intake in the German National Food Consumption Survey]. [Alimentary intake of selected pollutants and nitrate--results of a duplicate study in Bavarian homes for youth and seniors].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1