Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids.

B C Moore, J I Alcántara, B R Glasberg
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids.","authors":"B C Moore,&nbsp;J I Alcántara,&nbsp;B R Glasberg","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing aids with multi-channel compression are often fitted on the basis of loudness scaling data obtained using narrow bands of noise or tones. Here, we report the development and evaluation of an alternative fitting procedure based on the use of speech signals. The parameters of the hearing aid (the gains in each channel for high and low input levels) are adjusted adaptively under computer control on the basis of the listener's responses. The goal is that speech at 85 dB SPL should be judged as 'loud', speech at 60 dB SPL should be judged as 'quiet', and speech at both levels should be judged as 'neither tinny nor boomy'. The procedure was evaluated using a two-channel compression hearing aid, the remote control of which allowed two programs to be stored. One program was based on our fitting procedure. The other was either based on the manufacturer's recommended full fitting procedure (which included loudness scaling with bands of noise), or was based on the audiogram alone, using the manufacturer's algorithm. After an acclimatization period of at least two weeks, subjects were then asked to fill in a questionnaire about their experiences with the two programs in different listening situations. The results generally indicated a preference for the program based on our adaptive fitting procedure. We also conducted laboratory measurements of speech intelligibility, in quiet and in a background of a single competing talker. These showed no clear difference between programs, although scores overall were very high. We conclude that our adaptive procedure gives very satisfactory results in everyday life. Parameter values giving good comfort also give good intelligibility. The procedure typically takes between five and 10 minutes per ear, which is quicker than most loudness scaling procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"177-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000062","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Hearing aids with multi-channel compression are often fitted on the basis of loudness scaling data obtained using narrow bands of noise or tones. Here, we report the development and evaluation of an alternative fitting procedure based on the use of speech signals. The parameters of the hearing aid (the gains in each channel for high and low input levels) are adjusted adaptively under computer control on the basis of the listener's responses. The goal is that speech at 85 dB SPL should be judged as 'loud', speech at 60 dB SPL should be judged as 'quiet', and speech at both levels should be judged as 'neither tinny nor boomy'. The procedure was evaluated using a two-channel compression hearing aid, the remote control of which allowed two programs to be stored. One program was based on our fitting procedure. The other was either based on the manufacturer's recommended full fitting procedure (which included loudness scaling with bands of noise), or was based on the audiogram alone, using the manufacturer's algorithm. After an acclimatization period of at least two weeks, subjects were then asked to fill in a questionnaire about their experiences with the two programs in different listening situations. The results generally indicated a preference for the program based on our adaptive fitting procedure. We also conducted laboratory measurements of speech intelligibility, in quiet and in a background of a single competing talker. These showed no clear difference between programs, although scores overall were very high. We conclude that our adaptive procedure gives very satisfactory results in everyday life. Parameter values giving good comfort also give good intelligibility. The procedure typically takes between five and 10 minutes per ear, which is quicker than most loudness scaling procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多通道压缩助听器装配程序的开发与评估。
具有多声道压缩的助听器通常是根据使用窄带噪声或音调获得的响度缩放数据进行拟合的。在这里,我们报告了基于语音信号使用的替代拟合程序的开发和评估。助听器的参数(每个通道的高、低输入电平的增益)在计算机控制下根据听者的反应进行自适应调整。目标是85db SPL的语音应该被判断为“大声”,60db SPL的语音应该被判断为“安静”,两个级别的语音应该被判断为“既不细也不响”。使用双通道压缩助听器对该过程进行评估,其远程控制允许存储两个程序。一个程序是基于我们的拟合程序。另一种方法是基于制造商推荐的完整拟合程序(包括噪音带的响度缩放),或者使用制造商的算法仅基于听图。经过至少两周的适应期后,研究对象被要求填写一份问卷,调查他们在不同的听力环境下对这两个节目的体验。结果普遍表明,基于我们的自适应拟合程序的方案优先。我们还在安静和只有一个说话者的背景下进行了语音清晰度的实验室测量。尽管总体得分很高,但这些结果显示不同项目之间没有明显差异。我们的结论是,我们的适应程序在日常生活中得到了非常满意的结果。参数值提供了良好的舒适性,也提供了良好的可理解性。这个过程通常需要每只耳朵5到10分钟,这比大多数响度缩放过程都要快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards. Assessment of aided ABR thresholds before cochlear implantation. Community-based validation of the McCormick Toy Test. Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1