Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.

J Garnham, Y Cope, S M Mason
{"title":"Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.","authors":"J Garnham,&nbsp;Y Cope,&nbsp;S M Mason","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme (NPCIP) specializes in the implantation of children under 5 years of age. Subsequent tuning of the device and identification of changes in device function for these young children, who may have additional disabilities, can often be challenging. Thus, an objective measure to assess the integrity of the device is desirable. This study compares the device function by both objective and behavioural techniques in 30 children (age at implantation 3-11 years) at five years post-implantation. All children were implanted with the Nucleus Mini 22 device. Objective data were collected from integrity testing (IT) which allowed examination of the functioning of the implant by measuring the electrical stimulus artefact. This does not require the child to give a behavioural response. A protocol for a five-year post-implantation IT is suggested which examines common ground, monopolar and bipolar modes of operation. Behavioural data in the form of threshold (T) and comfort (C) levels were obtained by use of developmental age-appropriate techniques at 5 years post-implantation. Results demonstrate that 43.3% of patients had no electrode faults, 23.3% had potential faults on both behavioural and integrity testing, 6.7% were difficult to assess in terms of defining electrode faults due to partial electrode insertions, 13.3% had potential faults on behavioural testing only and 13.3% of patients had potential faults on IT only. In conclusion, IT is valuable in the identification of faulty electrodes, especially in young children and those with additional disabilities. Implementation of the five-year routine IT affected the management of 30% of patients. This study demonstrates that objective and behavioural techniques are complementary procedures in the ongoing management of paediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"34 5","pages":"285-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000140","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme (NPCIP) specializes in the implantation of children under 5 years of age. Subsequent tuning of the device and identification of changes in device function for these young children, who may have additional disabilities, can often be challenging. Thus, an objective measure to assess the integrity of the device is desirable. This study compares the device function by both objective and behavioural techniques in 30 children (age at implantation 3-11 years) at five years post-implantation. All children were implanted with the Nucleus Mini 22 device. Objective data were collected from integrity testing (IT) which allowed examination of the functioning of the implant by measuring the electrical stimulus artefact. This does not require the child to give a behavioural response. A protocol for a five-year post-implantation IT is suggested which examines common ground, monopolar and bipolar modes of operation. Behavioural data in the form of threshold (T) and comfort (C) levels were obtained by use of developmental age-appropriate techniques at 5 years post-implantation. Results demonstrate that 43.3% of patients had no electrode faults, 23.3% had potential faults on both behavioural and integrity testing, 6.7% were difficult to assess in terms of defining electrode faults due to partial electrode insertions, 13.3% had potential faults on behavioural testing only and 13.3% of patients had potential faults on IT only. In conclusion, IT is valuable in the identification of faulty electrodes, especially in young children and those with additional disabilities. Implementation of the five-year routine IT affected the management of 30% of patients. This study demonstrates that objective and behavioural techniques are complementary procedures in the ongoing management of paediatric patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿人工耳蜗植入后5年常规完整性检查的审计。
诺丁汉儿科人工耳蜗项目(NPCIP)专门为5岁以下儿童植入人工耳蜗。对于这些可能有其他残疾的幼儿,后续的设备调整和设备功能变化的识别通常是具有挑战性的。因此,需要一种客观的措施来评估装置的完整性。本研究通过客观和行为技术比较了30名儿童(植入时3-11岁)在植入后5年的设备功能。所有儿童都植入了Nucleus Mini 22装置。从完整性测试(IT)中收集客观数据,通过测量电刺激伪影来检查植入物的功能。这并不需要孩子做出行为反应。一个方案为五年植入后的信息技术提出了检查共同基础,单极和双极模式的操作。在植入后5年,使用发育适龄技术获得阈值(T)和舒适(C)水平形式的行为数据。结果表明,43.3%的患者没有电极故障,23.3%的患者在行为和完整性测试中都存在潜在故障,6.7%的患者由于部分电极插入而难以确定电极故障,13.3%的患者仅在行为测试中存在潜在故障,13.3%的患者仅在IT测试中存在潜在故障。总之,信息技术在识别有缺陷的电极方面是有价值的,特别是在幼儿和那些有额外残疾的人身上。实施五年常规信息技术影响了30%的患者的管理。这项研究表明,客观和行为技术是儿科患者持续管理的补充程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards. Assessment of aided ABR thresholds before cochlear implantation. Community-based validation of the McCormick Toy Test. Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1