A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom

R.M Leahy , J.C Mosher , M.E Spencer , M.X Huang , J.D Lewine
{"title":"A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom","authors":"R.M Leahy ,&nbsp;J.C Mosher ,&nbsp;M.E Spencer ,&nbsp;M.X Huang ,&nbsp;J.D Lewine","doi":"10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To investigate the accuracy of forward and inverse techniques for EEG and MEG dipole localization.</p><p><strong>Design and Methods:</strong> A human skull phantom was constructed with brain, skull and scalp layers and realistic relative conductivities. Thirty two independent current dipoles were distributed within the `brain' region and EEG and MEG data collected separately for each dipole. The true dipole locations and orientations and the morphology of the brain, skull and scalp layers were extracted from X-ray CT data. The location of each dipole was estimated from the EEG and MEG data using the R-MUSIC inverse method and forward models based on spherical and realistic head geometries. Additional computer simulations were performed to investigate the factors affecting localization accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Localization errors using the relatively simpler locally fitted sphere approach are only slightly greater than those using a BEM approach. The average localization error over the 32 dipoles was 7–8 mm for EEG and 3 mm for MEG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The superior performance of MEG over EEG appears to be because the latter is more sensitive to errors in the forward model arising from simplifying assumptions concerning the conductivity of the skull, scalp and brain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"107 2","pages":"Pages 159-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00057-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013469498000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the accuracy of forward and inverse techniques for EEG and MEG dipole localization.

Design and Methods: A human skull phantom was constructed with brain, skull and scalp layers and realistic relative conductivities. Thirty two independent current dipoles were distributed within the `brain' region and EEG and MEG data collected separately for each dipole. The true dipole locations and orientations and the morphology of the brain, skull and scalp layers were extracted from X-ray CT data. The location of each dipole was estimated from the EEG and MEG data using the R-MUSIC inverse method and forward models based on spherical and realistic head geometries. Additional computer simulations were performed to investigate the factors affecting localization accuracy.

Results: Localization errors using the relatively simpler locally fitted sphere approach are only slightly greater than those using a BEM approach. The average localization error over the 32 dipoles was 7–8 mm for EEG and 3 mm for MEG.

Conclusion: The superior performance of MEG over EEG appears to be because the latter is more sensitive to errors in the forward model arising from simplifying assumptions concerning the conductivity of the skull, scalp and brain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于颅骨幻像的脑电与脑电偶极子定位精度研究
目的:探讨脑电图和脑磁图偶极子定位的正、逆方法的准确性。设计与方法:采用脑、颅骨、头皮三层结构和真实的相对电导率构建人颅骨模型。32个独立的电流偶极子分布在“大脑”区域内,每个偶极子分别收集EEG和MEG数据。从x线CT数据中提取真实偶极子的位置和方向以及脑、颅骨和头皮层的形态。利用R-MUSIC逆方法和基于球形和真实头部几何形状的正演模型,从脑电和脑磁图数据中估计每个偶极子的位置。此外,还进行了计算机模拟,以研究影响定位精度的因素。结果:相对简单的局部拟合球法定位误差仅略大于边界元法定位误差。32个偶极子的平均定位误差EEG为7 ~ 8 mm, MEG为3 mm。结论:脑磁图优于脑电图可能是因为脑电图对正演模型的误差更敏感,因为正演模型简化了对颅骨、头皮和大脑电导率的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease. Deterioration from healthy to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease mirrored in corresponding loss of centrality in directed brain networks. The utility of radionucleotide imaging in the surgical management of axial neck pain from cervical facet joint arthropathy. Medical oncology future plan of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology: challenges and future needs of the Spanish oncologists. A central role for calcineurin in protein misfolding neurodegenerative diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1