Deterioration from healthy to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease mirrored in corresponding loss of centrality in directed brain networks.

Sinan Zhao, D Rangaprakash, Peipeng Liang, Gopikrishna Deshpande
{"title":"Deterioration from healthy to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease mirrored in corresponding loss of centrality in directed brain networks.","authors":"Sinan Zhao, D Rangaprakash, Peipeng Liang, Gopikrishna Deshpande","doi":"10.1186/s40708-019-0101-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is important to identify brain-based biomarkers that progressively deteriorate from healthy to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cortical thickness, amyloid-ß deposition, and graph measures derived from functional connectivity (FC) networks obtained using functional MRI (fMRI) have been previously identified as potential biomarkers. Specifically, in the latter case, betweenness centrality (BC), a nodal graph measure quantifying information flow, is reduced in both AD and MCI. However, all such reports have utilized BC calculated from undirected networks that characterize synchronization rather than information flow, which is better characterized using directed networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Therefore, we estimated BC from directed networks using Granger causality (GC) on resting-state fMRI data (N = 132) to compare the following populations (p < 0.05, FDR corrected for multiple comparisons): normal control (NC), early MCI (EMCI), late MCI (LMCI) and AD. We used an additional metric called middleman power (MP), which not only characterizes nodal information flow as in BC, but also measures nodal power critical for information flow in the entire network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MP detected more brain regions than BC that progressively deteriorated from NC to EMCI to LMCI to AD, as well as exhibited significant associations with behavioral measures. Additionally, graph measures obtained from conventional FC networks could not identify a single node, underscoring the relevance of GC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate the superiority of MP over BC as well as GC over FC in our case. MP obtained from GC networks could serve as a potential biomarker for progressive deterioration of MCI and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72888,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"20 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-019-0101-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is important to identify brain-based biomarkers that progressively deteriorate from healthy to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cortical thickness, amyloid-ß deposition, and graph measures derived from functional connectivity (FC) networks obtained using functional MRI (fMRI) have been previously identified as potential biomarkers. Specifically, in the latter case, betweenness centrality (BC), a nodal graph measure quantifying information flow, is reduced in both AD and MCI. However, all such reports have utilized BC calculated from undirected networks that characterize synchronization rather than information flow, which is better characterized using directed networks.

Methods: Therefore, we estimated BC from directed networks using Granger causality (GC) on resting-state fMRI data (N = 132) to compare the following populations (p < 0.05, FDR corrected for multiple comparisons): normal control (NC), early MCI (EMCI), late MCI (LMCI) and AD. We used an additional metric called middleman power (MP), which not only characterizes nodal information flow as in BC, but also measures nodal power critical for information flow in the entire network.

Results: MP detected more brain regions than BC that progressively deteriorated from NC to EMCI to LMCI to AD, as well as exhibited significant associations with behavioral measures. Additionally, graph measures obtained from conventional FC networks could not identify a single node, underscoring the relevance of GC.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the superiority of MP over BC as well as GC over FC in our case. MP obtained from GC networks could serve as a potential biomarker for progressive deterioration of MCI and AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从健康到轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病的恶化反映了定向大脑网络中心性的相应丧失。
目的:确定从健康到轻度认知障碍(MCI)再到阿尔茨海默病(AD)逐渐恶化的脑部生物标志物非常重要。皮质厚度、淀粉样蛋白-ß沉积以及通过功能性核磁共振成像(fMRI)获得的功能连接(FC)网络的图测量值已被确定为潜在的生物标志物。具体来说,在后一种情况下,AD 和 MCI 患者的信息间中心性(betweenness centrality,BC)会降低,而信息间中心性是一种量化信息流的节点图测量方法。然而,所有这些报告都是利用无向网络计算的BC值来表征同步性,而不是信息流,有向网络能更好地表征信息流:因此,我们在静息态 fMRI 数据(N = 132)上使用格兰杰因果关系(GC)估算了有向网络的 BC,并对以下人群进行了比较(p 结果:MP 比 BC 检测到更多的脑区:MP比BC检测出更多从NC到EMCI到LMCI再到AD逐渐恶化的脑区,并与行为测量结果有显著关联。此外,从传统 FC 网络中获得的图测量结果无法识别单个节点,这凸显了 GC 的相关性:我们的研究结果表明,在我们的病例中,MP优于BC,GC优于FC。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在我们的病例中,MP优于BC,GC优于FC。从GC网络中获得的MP可作为MCI和AD进行性恶化的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease. Deterioration from healthy to mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease mirrored in corresponding loss of centrality in directed brain networks. The utility of radionucleotide imaging in the surgical management of axial neck pain from cervical facet joint arthropathy. Medical oncology future plan of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology: challenges and future needs of the Spanish oncologists. A central role for calcineurin in protein misfolding neurodegenerative diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1