A critical analysis of directive counselling as a component of tinnitus retraining therapy.

P H Wilson, J L Henry, G Andersson, R S Hallam, P Lindberg
{"title":"A critical analysis of directive counselling as a component of tinnitus retraining therapy.","authors":"P H Wilson,&nbsp;J L Henry,&nbsp;G Andersson,&nbsp;R S Hallam,&nbsp;P Lindberg","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) has been presented as a new approach to tinnitus management. In this paper a number of theoretical and practical problems with TRT are identified. These problems relate to the distinction between directive counselling and cognitive therapy, the adequacy of the cognitive therapy components, the nature of the outcome data which have been presented to date, the theoretical basis for the treatment, and the conceptual clarity of terms such as perception, attention and coping. The stated goal of removal of the perception of tinnitus may lead to confusion about the likely outcome of TRT for most patients. Methodological limitations in the research which has been published to date preclude any claims about the efficacy of TRT at the present time. It is suggested that randomized, controlled studies which include no-treatment and placebo conditions need to be undertaken. Studies are required in which the efficacy of the counselling and white noise components can be clearly isolated. Suggestions are made about the role of psychologists and non-psychologists in the provision of counselling and cognitive therapy services to tinnitus patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 5","pages":"273-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000078","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) has been presented as a new approach to tinnitus management. In this paper a number of theoretical and practical problems with TRT are identified. These problems relate to the distinction between directive counselling and cognitive therapy, the adequacy of the cognitive therapy components, the nature of the outcome data which have been presented to date, the theoretical basis for the treatment, and the conceptual clarity of terms such as perception, attention and coping. The stated goal of removal of the perception of tinnitus may lead to confusion about the likely outcome of TRT for most patients. Methodological limitations in the research which has been published to date preclude any claims about the efficacy of TRT at the present time. It is suggested that randomized, controlled studies which include no-treatment and placebo conditions need to be undertaken. Studies are required in which the efficacy of the counselling and white noise components can be clearly isolated. Suggestions are made about the role of psychologists and non-psychologists in the provision of counselling and cognitive therapy services to tinnitus patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指导咨询作为耳鸣再训练治疗的一个组成部分的关键分析。
耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)是耳鸣治疗的一种新方法。本文指出了TRT的一些理论和实践问题。这些问题涉及指导咨询和认知治疗之间的区别,认知治疗成分的充分性,迄今为止提出的结果数据的性质,治疗的理论基础,以及诸如感知,注意和应对等术语的概念清晰度。对于大多数患者来说,去除耳鸣感觉的既定目标可能导致对TRT可能结果的混淆。迄今为止已发表的研究方法上的局限性使目前无法对TRT的功效作出任何声明。建议进行随机对照研究,包括无治疗和安慰剂条件。需要进行研究,使咨询和白噪声成分的功效能够清楚地分离出来。对心理学家和非心理学家在为耳鸣患者提供咨询和认知治疗服务中的作用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards. Assessment of aided ABR thresholds before cochlear implantation. Community-based validation of the McCormick Toy Test. Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1