Referral and diagnosis of common rheumatic diseases by primary care physicians.

J I Gamez-Nava, L Gonzalez-Lopez, P Davis, M E Suarez-Almazor
{"title":"Referral and diagnosis of common rheumatic diseases by primary care physicians.","authors":"J I Gamez-Nava,&nbsp;L Gonzalez-Lopez,&nbsp;P Davis,&nbsp;M E Suarez-Almazor","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe primary care patterns of referral and diagnoses of patients with rheumatic diseases referred to rheumatologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of all consecutive patients referred in 1994 by >300 primary care physicians to two rheumatologists at an academic centre were reviewed. The referring physician diagnosis was compared with the rheumatologist's diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of primary care diagnoses were estimated using the rheumatologist diagnosis as the 'gold standard'.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based rheumatology out-patient clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of the patients referred had a rheumatologist diagnosis of soft-tissue rheumatism or a spinal pain syndrome. Three hundred and forty-seven patients (49%) had a primary care diagnosis of a defined rheumatic disease. Of these, 142 (41%) of the primary care diagnoses were subsequently modified by the rheumatologist. The highest agreement between primary care physician and rheumatologist was observed for crystal-induced arthritis (kappa = 0.86), and the lowest agreement for polymyalgia rheumatica (kappa = 0.39) and systemic lupus (kappa = 0.46). Sensitivity was lowest for a primary care diagnosis of fibromyalgia (48%) and highest for ankylosing spondylitis (94%). Positive predictive values were generally low, in particular for systemic lupus erythematosus (33%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients referred to an academic rheumatology centre had soft-tissue rheumatism or other pain syndromes. In general, diagnostic agreement between rheumatologists and primary care physicians was low. Increased emphasis on musculoskeletal disorders should be encouraged in medical education to increase the efficiency of rheumatology referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 11","pages":"1215-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1215","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

Objective: To describe primary care patterns of referral and diagnoses of patients with rheumatic diseases referred to rheumatologists.

Methods: The medical records of all consecutive patients referred in 1994 by >300 primary care physicians to two rheumatologists at an academic centre were reviewed. The referring physician diagnosis was compared with the rheumatologist's diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of primary care diagnoses were estimated using the rheumatologist diagnosis as the 'gold standard'.

Setting: University-based rheumatology out-patient clinic.

Results: Over half of the patients referred had a rheumatologist diagnosis of soft-tissue rheumatism or a spinal pain syndrome. Three hundred and forty-seven patients (49%) had a primary care diagnosis of a defined rheumatic disease. Of these, 142 (41%) of the primary care diagnoses were subsequently modified by the rheumatologist. The highest agreement between primary care physician and rheumatologist was observed for crystal-induced arthritis (kappa = 0.86), and the lowest agreement for polymyalgia rheumatica (kappa = 0.39) and systemic lupus (kappa = 0.46). Sensitivity was lowest for a primary care diagnosis of fibromyalgia (48%) and highest for ankylosing spondylitis (94%). Positive predictive values were generally low, in particular for systemic lupus erythematosus (33%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (30%).

Conclusion: Most patients referred to an academic rheumatology centre had soft-tissue rheumatism or other pain syndromes. In general, diagnostic agreement between rheumatologists and primary care physicians was low. Increased emphasis on musculoskeletal disorders should be encouraged in medical education to increase the efficiency of rheumatology referrals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健医生对常见风湿病的转诊和诊断。
目的:描述风湿性疾病患者转诊和诊断的初级保健模式。方法:回顾1994年由300多名初级保健医生连续转诊给某学术中心两名风湿病学家的所有患者的病历。将转诊医师的诊断与风湿病专家的诊断进行比较。使用风湿病学家诊断作为“金标准”来估计初级保健诊断的敏感性、特异性和预测值。地点:大学风湿病门诊。结果:超过一半的患者被风湿病学家诊断为软组织风湿病或脊柱疼痛综合征。347名患者(49%)有明确的风湿病初级保健诊断。其中,142例(41%)的初级保健诊断随后由风湿病学家修改。初级保健医生和风湿病学家之间的一致性最高的是晶体性关节炎(kappa = 0.86),一致性最低的是风湿性多肌痛(kappa = 0.39)和系统性狼疮(kappa = 0.46)。初级保健诊断纤维肌痛的敏感性最低(48%),强直性脊柱炎的敏感性最高(94%)。阳性预测值普遍较低,特别是系统性红斑狼疮(33%)和风湿性多肌痛(30%)。结论:大多数到风湿病学术中心就诊的患者都有软组织风湿病或其他疼痛综合征。总的来说,风湿病学家和初级保健医生之间的诊断一致性很低。应鼓励在医学教育中增加对肌肉骨骼疾病的重视,以提高风湿病转诊的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auranofin. The Heberden Oration 1997. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: from symptomatic relief to potential cure. Electron microscopy and capillaroscopically guided nailfold biopsy in connective tissue diseases: detection of ultrastructural changes of the microcirculatory vessels. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia in females without psychiatric disorder. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in primary Sjögren's syndrome: prevalence and clinical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1