A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia in females without psychiatric disorder.

P Hannonen, K Malminiemi, U Yli-Kerttula, R Isomeri, P Roponen
{"title":"A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia in females without psychiatric disorder.","authors":"P Hannonen,&nbsp;K Malminiemi,&nbsp;U Yli-Kerttula,&nbsp;R Isomeri,&nbsp;P Roponen","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/37.12.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the usefulness of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) in females without psychiatric disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present four centre, 12 week study, 130 female FM patients not suffering from psychiatric disorders were randomized to receive amitriptyline (AMI; 25 37.5 mg), moclobemide (MOCLO; 450-600 mg) or identical placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four, 54 and 49 per cent of patients on AMI, MOCLO and placebo, respectively, were judged as responders. The patients on AMI also managed best regarding the respective improvements during the trial in general health, pain, sleep quality and quantity, and fatigue on visual analogue scales (VAS), the areas of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), as well as in the three Sheehan's functional disability scales. In the within-group comparisons, MOCLO also improved pain assessed both on VAS and on the NHP pain dimension, but the improvement was invalidated by the poor success of the drug with regard to sleep. The tolerabilities of all three drugs were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that MOCLO may not be helpful in FM patients free from clinically meaningful psychiatric problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 12","pages":"1279-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.12.1279","citationCount":"127","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.12.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

Abstract

Objective: To study the usefulness of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) in females without psychiatric disorder.

Methods: In the present four centre, 12 week study, 130 female FM patients not suffering from psychiatric disorders were randomized to receive amitriptyline (AMI; 25 37.5 mg), moclobemide (MOCLO; 450-600 mg) or identical placebo.

Results: Seventy-four, 54 and 49 per cent of patients on AMI, MOCLO and placebo, respectively, were judged as responders. The patients on AMI also managed best regarding the respective improvements during the trial in general health, pain, sleep quality and quantity, and fatigue on visual analogue scales (VAS), the areas of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), as well as in the three Sheehan's functional disability scales. In the within-group comparisons, MOCLO also improved pain assessed both on VAS and on the NHP pain dimension, but the improvement was invalidated by the poor success of the drug with regard to sleep. The tolerabilities of all three drugs were comparable.

Conclusion: The study indicates that MOCLO may not be helpful in FM patients free from clinically meaningful psychiatric problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫氯比胺和阿米替林治疗无精神障碍女性纤维肌痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
目的:探讨莫氯比胺联合阿米替林治疗无精神障碍女性纤维肌痛(FM)的疗效。方法:在4个中心,12周的研究中,130例无精神障碍的女性FM患者随机接受阿米替林(AMI;25 37.5 mg),莫氯贝胺(MOCLO;450-600毫克)或相同的安慰剂。结果:AMI、MOCLO和安慰剂组分别有74%、54%和49%的患者被判定为有反应。在试验期间,AMI患者在总体健康、疼痛、睡眠质量和数量以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)、诺丁汉健康概况(NHP)区域以及三个Sheehan功能残疾量表方面的各自改善方面也得到了最好的管理。在组内比较中,MOCLO也改善了VAS和NHP疼痛维度的疼痛评估,但由于药物在睡眠方面的不佳效果,这种改善无效。三种药物的耐受性具有可比性。结论:本研究提示MOCLO对无临床意义精神问题的FM患者可能没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auranofin. The Heberden Oration 1997. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: from symptomatic relief to potential cure. Electron microscopy and capillaroscopically guided nailfold biopsy in connective tissue diseases: detection of ultrastructural changes of the microcirculatory vessels. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia in females without psychiatric disorder. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in primary Sjögren's syndrome: prevalence and clinical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1