Parental alleles of an imprinted mouse transgene replicate synchronously.

M Shuster, M S Dhar, A L Olins, D E Olins, C Y Howell, S M Gollin, J R Chaillet
{"title":"Parental alleles of an imprinted mouse transgene replicate synchronously.","authors":"M Shuster,&nbsp;M S Dhar,&nbsp;A L Olins,&nbsp;D E Olins,&nbsp;C Y Howell,&nbsp;S M Gollin,&nbsp;J R Chaillet","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)23:4<275::AID-DVG3>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular features of imprinted genes include differences in expression, methylation, and the timing of DNA replication between parental alleles. Whereas methylation differences always seem to be associated with differences in expression, differences in the timing of replication between parental homologs are not always seen at imprinted loci. These observations raise the possibility that differences in replication timing may not be an essential feature underlying genomic imprinting. In this study, we examined the timing of replication of the two alleles of the imprinted RSVIgmyc transgene in individual embryonic cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The cis-acting signals for RSVIgmyc imprinting are within RSVIgmyc itself. Thus, allele-specific differences in replication, if they indeed govern RSVIgmyc imprinting, should be found in RSVIgmyc sequences. We found that the parental alleles of RSVIgmyc, which exhibit differences in methylation, replicated at the same time. Synchronous replication was also seen in embryonic cells containing a modified version of RSVIgmyc that exhibited parental allele differences in both methylation and expression. These findings indicate that maintenance of expression and methylation differences between alleles does not require a difference in replication timing. The differences in replication timing of endogenous imprinted alleles detected by FISH might therefore reflect structural differences between the two alleles that could be a consequence of imprinting or, alternatively, could be unrelated to imprinting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11344,"journal":{"name":"Developmental genetics","volume":"23 4","pages":"275-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)23:4<275::AID-DVG3>3.0.CO;2-#","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)23:4<275::AID-DVG3>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Molecular features of imprinted genes include differences in expression, methylation, and the timing of DNA replication between parental alleles. Whereas methylation differences always seem to be associated with differences in expression, differences in the timing of replication between parental homologs are not always seen at imprinted loci. These observations raise the possibility that differences in replication timing may not be an essential feature underlying genomic imprinting. In this study, we examined the timing of replication of the two alleles of the imprinted RSVIgmyc transgene in individual embryonic cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The cis-acting signals for RSVIgmyc imprinting are within RSVIgmyc itself. Thus, allele-specific differences in replication, if they indeed govern RSVIgmyc imprinting, should be found in RSVIgmyc sequences. We found that the parental alleles of RSVIgmyc, which exhibit differences in methylation, replicated at the same time. Synchronous replication was also seen in embryonic cells containing a modified version of RSVIgmyc that exhibited parental allele differences in both methylation and expression. These findings indicate that maintenance of expression and methylation differences between alleles does not require a difference in replication timing. The differences in replication timing of endogenous imprinted alleles detected by FISH might therefore reflect structural differences between the two alleles that could be a consequence of imprinting or, alternatively, could be unrelated to imprinting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印迹小鼠转基因亲本等位基因同步复制。
印迹基因的分子特征包括亲本等位基因之间表达、甲基化和DNA复制时间的差异。尽管甲基化差异似乎总是与表达差异有关,但在印迹位点上,亲本同源物之间复制时间的差异并不总是可见。这些观察结果提出了一种可能性,即复制时间的差异可能不是基因组印记的基本特征。在这项研究中,我们使用荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测了印迹RSVIgmyc转基因的两个等位基因在单个胚胎细胞中的复制时间。RSVIgmyc印迹的顺式作用信号存在于RSVIgmyc自身。因此,等位基因特异性复制差异,如果它们确实控制RSVIgmyc印记,应该在RSVIgmyc序列中发现。我们发现RSVIgmyc的亲本等位基因在甲基化上存在差异,但同时复制。在含有RSVIgmyc修饰版本的胚胎细胞中也发现了同步复制,其甲基化和表达均表现出亲本等位基因的差异。这些发现表明,维持等位基因之间的表达和甲基化差异并不需要复制时间的差异。因此,FISH检测到的内源性印迹等位基因复制时间的差异可能反映了两个等位基因之间的结构差异,这些差异可能是印迹的结果,也可能与印迹无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suppression of human prostate cancer cell growth by forced expression of connexin genes. Two Nkx-3-related genes are expressed in the adult and regenerating central nervous system of the urodele Pleurodeles waltl. Parental alleles of an imprinted mouse transgene replicate synchronously. Role of environmental signals and transcriptional regulators in neural crest development. Ectopic expression of Fgf-4 in chimeric mouse embryos induces the expression of early markers of limb development in the lateral ridge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1