Studying the determinants of exposure: a review of methods.

I Burstyn, K Teschke
{"title":"Studying the determinants of exposure: a review of methods.","authors":"I Burstyn,&nbsp;K Teschke","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand where, when, and how to control occupational exposures, it is vital that hygienists understand the factors that contribute to elevated or reduced exposure levels. Over the last two decades a burgeoning literature examining the determinants of exposure has developed, yet to date the methods used in this regard have rarely been summarized in texts or elsewhere. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the techniques used to study the predictors of workplace exposures. Both experimental and observational studies are examined, and the advantages and limitations of each are discussed. Fundamental study design features are reviewed. These include the selection and measurement of factors potentially related to exposure, as well as the measurement of exposure itself. Decisions reached by investigators in selecting the number of sites and workers, the number of repeated observations per worker, and the duration of sampling are discussed. Also examined are issues that commonly arise in the course of data analysis of exposure determinants. These include transformation of exposure variables, correlation of predictor variables, empirical model building, and interpretation of results. Finally, methods employed to evaluate the validity of findings are summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"57-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984423","citationCount":"145","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

Abstract

To better understand where, when, and how to control occupational exposures, it is vital that hygienists understand the factors that contribute to elevated or reduced exposure levels. Over the last two decades a burgeoning literature examining the determinants of exposure has developed, yet to date the methods used in this regard have rarely been summarized in texts or elsewhere. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the techniques used to study the predictors of workplace exposures. Both experimental and observational studies are examined, and the advantages and limitations of each are discussed. Fundamental study design features are reviewed. These include the selection and measurement of factors potentially related to exposure, as well as the measurement of exposure itself. Decisions reached by investigators in selecting the number of sites and workers, the number of repeated observations per worker, and the duration of sampling are discussed. Also examined are issues that commonly arise in the course of data analysis of exposure determinants. These include transformation of exposure variables, correlation of predictor variables, empirical model building, and interpretation of results. Finally, methods employed to evaluate the validity of findings are summarized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究暴露的决定因素:方法综述。
为了更好地了解在何处、何时以及如何控制职业暴露,卫生学家了解导致暴露水平升高或降低的因素至关重要。在过去的二十年中,研究暴露决定因素的新兴文献已经发展起来,但迄今为止,在这方面使用的方法很少在文本或其他地方进行总结。本文的目的是概述用于研究工作场所暴露预测因素的技术。实验研究和观察研究都进行了检查,并讨论了各自的优点和局限性。回顾研究设计的基本特征。这包括选择和测量可能与暴露有关的因素,以及测量暴露本身。讨论了调查人员在选择地点和工作人员数量、每个工作人员重复观察的次数和抽样持续时间方面所作出的决定。还审查了在暴露决定因素的数据分析过程中通常出现的问题。这些包括暴露变量的转换、预测变量的相关性、经验模型的建立和结果的解释。最后,总结了评估研究结果有效性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of leakage from a metal machining center using tracer gas methods: a case study. Assessment of magnetic field exposures for a mortality study at a uranium enrichment plant. An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades. Prediction of rectal temperature by the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor under low and moderate heat stress. The effects of keyswitch stiffness on typing force, finger electromyography, and subjective discomfort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1