Prediction of rectal temperature by the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor under low and moderate heat stress.

Abstract

This study assessed the use of aural canal temperature measured with the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor (Tq) relative to rectal temperature (Tre) during simulated industrial work in three different wet bulb globe temperatures (WBGT). Sixteen subjects performed walking and arm curl exercise at a rate of 300 kcal/hour for 4 hours while wearing Saranex protective coveralls in 18, 23, and 27 degrees C WBGT environments and wearing the Questemp II. Correlations were determined between Tre and Tq for the three conditions and for all conditions combined. Pearson r values were 0.48 (18 degrees C WBGT), 0.42 (23 degrees C WBGT), 0.38 (27 degrees WBGT), and 0.50 (all trials). Because a major concern is safe maximum core body temperature, means and standard deviations for differences between Tre and Tq were assessed at peak temperatures to determine the predictability of Tre from Tq solely at these points. Large standard deviations in delta values relative to a small overall tolerable temperature range ruled out the use of Tq in this manner. Based on the current data, aural canal temperature as measured with the Questemp II did not provide an accurate reflection of Tre across time nor at peak core temperatures during low to moderate heat strain.