Australian aborigines represent the first branch from Eurasian antecedents: odontometric evidence.

E D Shields
{"title":"Australian aborigines represent the first branch from Eurasian antecedents: odontometric evidence.","authors":"E D Shields","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most genetic data suggest that Australian aborigines and Southeast Asians associate, but their relative evolutionary relationship has remained obscure. Historically, the study of tooth crown variables has been important in establishing phylogenetic relationships. Through the quantification of whole tooth structure (GDP), including root, pulp, and enamel, a likely Eurasian phylogeny emerged from a canonical discriminant analysis of the microevolution among the populations. The analysis suggested that in modern human evolutionary history, Australian aborigines are the best representative extant population (first branch) from an unknown antecedent Eurasian founder population. The next branch from the Asian-based antecedent population was Caucasoids. Within the resident antecedent East Asian population, Southeast Asians then evolved, followed by a branch that lead to antecedent east Central Asians. Mongolians and all Native Americans independently evolved from this antecedent east Central Asian population. The relatively short morphogenetic separation between two areas that have been isolated for great periods of time, i.e., Australian aborigines and Native Americans, suggests that their association is not due to gene flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":77201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology","volume":"18 4","pages":"228-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most genetic data suggest that Australian aborigines and Southeast Asians associate, but their relative evolutionary relationship has remained obscure. Historically, the study of tooth crown variables has been important in establishing phylogenetic relationships. Through the quantification of whole tooth structure (GDP), including root, pulp, and enamel, a likely Eurasian phylogeny emerged from a canonical discriminant analysis of the microevolution among the populations. The analysis suggested that in modern human evolutionary history, Australian aborigines are the best representative extant population (first branch) from an unknown antecedent Eurasian founder population. The next branch from the Asian-based antecedent population was Caucasoids. Within the resident antecedent East Asian population, Southeast Asians then evolved, followed by a branch that lead to antecedent east Central Asians. Mongolians and all Native Americans independently evolved from this antecedent east Central Asian population. The relatively short morphogenetic separation between two areas that have been isolated for great periods of time, i.e., Australian aborigines and Native Americans, suggests that their association is not due to gene flow.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚土著人代表了来自欧亚祖先的第一个分支:牙齿测量证据。
大多数遗传数据表明,澳大利亚土著人和东南亚人有联系,但他们的相对进化关系仍然不清楚。历史上,牙冠变量的研究在建立系统发育关系方面一直很重要。通过对包括牙根、牙髓和牙釉质在内的全牙结构(GDP)的量化,从种群间微进化的典型判别分析中出现了一个可能的欧亚系统发生。分析结果表明,在现代人类进化史上,澳大利亚土著是一个未知的欧亚祖先种群中最具代表性的现存种群(第一分支)。亚洲人的下一个分支是高加索人。在以前的东亚居民中,东南亚人随后进化,随后是一个分支,导致了以前的东中亚人。蒙古人和所有的美洲原住民都是由这个先前的东中亚人口独立进化而来的。澳大利亚土著居民和美洲土著居民这两个已经隔离了很长时间的地区之间相对较短的形态发生分离表明,他们的联系不是由于基因流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hyaluronan is essential for the expansion of the cranial base growth plates. Vertical regulation of En-2 expression and eye development by FGFs and BMPs. Influences of osteoclast deficiency on craniofacial growth in osteopetrotic (op/op) mice. Merging the old skeletal biology with the new. I. Intramembranous ossification, endochondral ossification, ectopic bone, secondary cartilage, and pathologic considerations. Merging the old skeletal biology with the new. II. Molecular aspects of bone formation and bone growth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1