Legal review: access to adoption records--recent developments in case and statutory law.

Topics in health record management Pub Date : 1991-03-01
W H Roach
{"title":"Legal review: access to adoption records--recent developments in case and statutory law.","authors":"W H Roach","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent state court decisions on access to adoption records manifest judicial lack of sympathy toward disclosure of confidential adoption information and a reluctance to abandon earlier precedents. The courts have long frowned upon any action that would potentially discourage or impede the adoption process or that would potentially hurt any of the parties involved. The state legislatures, in response to intense lobbying by adoption groups, have tempered the rigid standards of earlier laws, allowing for the creation of adoption registry services in 21 states and for independent searches for biological parents to solicit their consent in 9 states. Still, only 3 states give an absolute right of inspection, while 18 require a court order before access to records will be allowed. Medical records practitioners should determine the rules applicable to the medical records of adoptees in their states. In the absence of specific court or statutory authority permitting the release of such records or of the consent of the natural parents, practitioners should refuse access to these records.</p>","PeriodicalId":79757,"journal":{"name":"Topics in health record management","volume":"11 3","pages":"81-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in health record management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent state court decisions on access to adoption records manifest judicial lack of sympathy toward disclosure of confidential adoption information and a reluctance to abandon earlier precedents. The courts have long frowned upon any action that would potentially discourage or impede the adoption process or that would potentially hurt any of the parties involved. The state legislatures, in response to intense lobbying by adoption groups, have tempered the rigid standards of earlier laws, allowing for the creation of adoption registry services in 21 states and for independent searches for biological parents to solicit their consent in 9 states. Still, only 3 states give an absolute right of inspection, while 18 require a court order before access to records will be allowed. Medical records practitioners should determine the rules applicable to the medical records of adoptees in their states. In the absence of specific court or statutory authority permitting the release of such records or of the consent of the natural parents, practitioners should refuse access to these records.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律审查:查阅收养记录——判例法和成文法的最新进展。
最近州法院关于获取收养记录的判决表明,司法对披露保密的收养信息缺乏同情,不愿放弃先前的先例。长期以来,法院一直不赞成任何可能阻碍或阻碍收养过程的行为,也不赞成任何可能伤害有关各方的行为。为了回应收养团体的强烈游说,州立法机构已经缓和了早期法律的严格标准,允许在21个州建立收养登记服务,并允许在9个州独立寻找亲生父母以征求他们的同意。尽管如此,只有3个州赋予了绝对的检查权利,而18个州要求在允许查阅记录之前获得法院命令。医疗记录从业人员应确定适用于其所在州被收养者医疗记录的规则。如果没有特别的法院或法定机构允许公布这些记录,或没有征得亲生父母的同意,从业员应拒绝查阅这些记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement techniques. Voice-activated reporting systems: an innovative technology. Research review: differentiation of roles and functions of medical record practitioners. Techniques for dataset design: a utilization management system model. Legal review: the medical records implications of state and federal anti-dumping provisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1