Joint Commission completes transition to functional standards.

Health care law newsletter Pub Date : 1995-01-01
I Penner
{"title":"Joint Commission completes transition to functional standards.","authors":"I Penner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Joint Commission's new emphasis on performance-based standards led it to identify functions it believed were likely to have the most significant impact on patient outcomes. Carrying out these functions requires an interdisciplinary team approach to patient care. Thus, the old strategy of handing out one manual chapter to each department head and asking him or her to implement the standards in that chapter will not work in 1995. Rather, providers will have to allocate already stretched human and financial resources to redesign their methods of assessing and improving patient outcomes in order to comply with yet another major revision of the Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. To ensure an adequate understanding of and compliance with Joint Commission standards, organizations should make the entire CAMH \"required reading\" for its leadership and make it available in strategic areas of the hospital for review by all employees. While the Joint Commission recognizes that its new functional approach will take some time to implement, all providers that want to ensure that they remain accredited should begin now to orient their leadership, staff, and employees to the new functional standards in the CAMH and the ways in which those standards affect patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79604,"journal":{"name":"Health care law newsletter","volume":"10 1","pages":"12-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health care law newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Joint Commission's new emphasis on performance-based standards led it to identify functions it believed were likely to have the most significant impact on patient outcomes. Carrying out these functions requires an interdisciplinary team approach to patient care. Thus, the old strategy of handing out one manual chapter to each department head and asking him or her to implement the standards in that chapter will not work in 1995. Rather, providers will have to allocate already stretched human and financial resources to redesign their methods of assessing and improving patient outcomes in order to comply with yet another major revision of the Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. To ensure an adequate understanding of and compliance with Joint Commission standards, organizations should make the entire CAMH "required reading" for its leadership and make it available in strategic areas of the hospital for review by all employees. While the Joint Commission recognizes that its new functional approach will take some time to implement, all providers that want to ensure that they remain accredited should begin now to orient their leadership, staff, and employees to the new functional standards in the CAMH and the ways in which those standards affect patient outcomes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合委员会完成向职能标准的过渡。
联合委员会对基于绩效的标准的新强调,使其确定了它认为可能对患者预后产生最重大影响的功能。执行这些功能需要一个跨学科的团队方法来照顾病人。因此,向每个部门负责人分发一章手册并要求他或她执行该章中的标准的旧战略在1995年将行不通。相反,供应商将不得不分配已经紧张的人力和财政资源,重新设计评估和改善患者结果的方法,以符合《医院认证手册》的又一次重大修订。为了确保充分理解和遵守联合委员会的标准,各组织应将整个CAMH作为其领导层的“必读材料”,并将其提供给医院的战略领域,供所有员工审查。虽然联合委员会认识到其新的功能方法将需要一段时间来实施,但所有希望确保其保持认证的提供者现在应该开始指导其领导,员工和员工了解CAMH的新功能标准以及这些标准影响患者预后的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State legislative approaches to regulating the use of genetic information. State Medicaid reform under Section 1115 demonstration authority. Arnett v. Dal Cielo: peer review confidentiality threatened by medical board investigational subpoenas. Commissioner v. Schleier: back to the drawing board on the taxation of employment dispute recoveries. Managed care liability and the capitated provider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1