Commissioner v. Schleier: back to the drawing board on the taxation of employment dispute recoveries.

Health care law newsletter Pub Date : 1995-11-01
M T Schieble
{"title":"Commissioner v. Schleier: back to the drawing board on the taxation of employment dispute recoveries.","authors":"M T Schieble","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Court's decision in Schleier leaves the taxation of recoveries arising out of employment disputes, as well as many other types of disputes, in a state of confusion. To be sure, employers and employees now know with certainty that recoveries under the ADEA are not excludable from income under Section 104(a)(2). Recoveries under other statutes, however, including the Fair Labor Standards Act and the 1991 version of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, are altogether unclear after Schleier. In the absence of further guidance, employers should consider adopting a more conservative approach to employment dispute settlements by treating settlement payments as taxable income, subject to withholding and employment taxes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79604,"journal":{"name":"Health care law newsletter","volume":"10 11","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health care law newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Court's decision in Schleier leaves the taxation of recoveries arising out of employment disputes, as well as many other types of disputes, in a state of confusion. To be sure, employers and employees now know with certainty that recoveries under the ADEA are not excludable from income under Section 104(a)(2). Recoveries under other statutes, however, including the Fair Labor Standards Act and the 1991 version of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, are altogether unclear after Schleier. In the absence of further guidance, employers should consider adopting a more conservative approach to employment dispute settlements by treating settlement payments as taxable income, subject to withholding and employment taxes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专员诉Schleier案:关于对就业争议追偿征税的问题重新开始。
法院在Schleier案中的裁决使因就业纠纷以及许多其他类型的纠纷而产生的追讨款项的征税处于混乱状态。可以肯定的是,雇主和雇员现在都清楚地知道,根据ADEA获得的赔偿不能排除在第104(a)(2)条规定的收入之外。然而,在施莱尔之后,包括《公平劳动标准法》和《1964年民权法案》1991年版第七章在内的其他法规下的赔偿就完全不清楚了。在缺乏进一步指导的情况下,雇主应考虑采取一种更为保守的办法来解决就业纠纷,将和解金视为应纳税收入,须缴纳预扣税和就业税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State legislative approaches to regulating the use of genetic information. State Medicaid reform under Section 1115 demonstration authority. Arnett v. Dal Cielo: peer review confidentiality threatened by medical board investigational subpoenas. Commissioner v. Schleier: back to the drawing board on the taxation of employment dispute recoveries. Managed care liability and the capitated provider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1