Horizontal versus vertical--two restructuring approaches to the same vision.

PFCA review Pub Date : 1995-01-01
W J Leander, M G Galloway
{"title":"Horizontal versus vertical--two restructuring approaches to the same vision.","authors":"W J Leander,&nbsp;M G Galloway","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In summary, horizontal and vertical restructuring represent two different paths to the same vision. Both require a rock-solid foundation for success. In deciding the best approach for your organization, consider the trade-offs between the cultural (\"we versus them\") and operational (\"to leap or not to leap\") challenges associated with each approach. Furthermore, consider the differences in savings streams from these two paths. Then customize a restructuring initiative that best fits your organizational goals and priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":80124,"journal":{"name":"PFCA review","volume":" ","pages":"2-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PFCA review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In summary, horizontal and vertical restructuring represent two different paths to the same vision. Both require a rock-solid foundation for success. In deciding the best approach for your organization, consider the trade-offs between the cultural ("we versus them") and operational ("to leap or not to leap") challenges associated with each approach. Furthermore, consider the differences in savings streams from these two paths. Then customize a restructuring initiative that best fits your organizational goals and priorities.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水平与垂直——实现相同愿景的两种重组方法。
总而言之,水平和垂直重组代表了实现同一愿景的两条不同路径。两者都需要坚如磐石的成功基础。在为您的组织决定最佳方法时,请考虑与每种方法相关的文化(“我们对他们”)和操作(“跳过还是不跳过”)挑战之间的权衡。此外,考虑这两条路径的储蓄流的差异。然后定制一个最适合你的组织目标和优先级的重组计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing support and administrative roles. Opportunities for changing non-clinical services. Restructuring critical care services. Part II: A proven assessment and redesign process. Transfer pricing. Part II: Vignettes from the front lines. Leadership spotlight. "A tough, but worthwhile delivery". Leadership value added profile: a valuable self-improvement tool for leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1