Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument.

M Boymans, W A Dreschler, P Schoneveld, H Verschuure
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a full-digital in-the-ear hearing instrument.","authors":"M Boymans,&nbsp;W A Dreschler,&nbsp;P Schoneveld,&nbsp;H Verschuure","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we measured the efficacy of a digital hearing aid with compression and noise reduction in a well-controlled clinical field trial in two independent centres. The experiments focused on a number of aspects of the application of the digital hearing aids. The study combines a field test of 2x4 weeks with laboratory experiments. We used objective measurements (speech perception tests in background noise, loudness scaling) and subjective assessments (questionnaires). The measurements were performed before and after the field test. The questionnaires were collected after each field test. The results of the digital hearing aids were compared to the results of similar tests with newly fitted analogue reference aids. The study involved 27 sensorineural hearing-impaired subjects, wearing new hearing aids. They comprised a representative sample of in-the-ear users. We used a crossover design in which the subjects used successively digital hearing aids and analogue reference aids in a randomized order. On average, the subjective data are more positive than the objective data. In the end, 20 out of 27 subjects had an overall preference for the digital hearing aid. The financial implications were not taken into consideration. However, objective data do not support this strong subjective preference. A reason could be that the method of analysis (short sentences in a short-duration background noise) is not suited for the digital hearing aid; the testing procedure does not allow the noise-reduction algorithm to adapt to the background noise. There was a striking difference between the results for the two centres. This difference can, to at least a certain extent, be attributed to the timing of speech relative to the background noise in the objective tests. This illustrates that the test conditions are critical in modern non-linear signal-processing hearing aids with long time constants. New evaluation techniques should be developed for this new generation of active non-linear hearing aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 2","pages":"99-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073009","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

In this study we measured the efficacy of a digital hearing aid with compression and noise reduction in a well-controlled clinical field trial in two independent centres. The experiments focused on a number of aspects of the application of the digital hearing aids. The study combines a field test of 2x4 weeks with laboratory experiments. We used objective measurements (speech perception tests in background noise, loudness scaling) and subjective assessments (questionnaires). The measurements were performed before and after the field test. The questionnaires were collected after each field test. The results of the digital hearing aids were compared to the results of similar tests with newly fitted analogue reference aids. The study involved 27 sensorineural hearing-impaired subjects, wearing new hearing aids. They comprised a representative sample of in-the-ear users. We used a crossover design in which the subjects used successively digital hearing aids and analogue reference aids in a randomized order. On average, the subjective data are more positive than the objective data. In the end, 20 out of 27 subjects had an overall preference for the digital hearing aid. The financial implications were not taken into consideration. However, objective data do not support this strong subjective preference. A reason could be that the method of analysis (short sentences in a short-duration background noise) is not suited for the digital hearing aid; the testing procedure does not allow the noise-reduction algorithm to adapt to the background noise. There was a striking difference between the results for the two centres. This difference can, to at least a certain extent, be attributed to the timing of speech relative to the background noise in the objective tests. This illustrates that the test conditions are critical in modern non-linear signal-processing hearing aids with long time constants. New evaluation techniques should be developed for this new generation of active non-linear hearing aids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全数字耳内助听器的临床评价。
在这项研究中,我们在两个独立的中心进行了一项控制良好的临床现场试验,测量了数字助听器的压缩和降噪效果。实验集中在数字助听器应用的几个方面。该研究将2x4周的现场试验与实验室试验相结合。我们使用了客观测量(背景噪声下的语音感知测试,响度缩放)和主观评估(问卷调查)。测量是在现场测试前后进行的。问卷在每次现场测试后收集。将数字助听器的测试结果与新安装的模拟参考助听器的类似测试结果进行了比较。这项研究涉及27名感觉神经性听力受损的受试者,他们戴着新的助听器。他们组成了耳朵用户的代表性样本。我们采用交叉设计,受试者按随机顺序依次使用数字助听器和模拟参考助听器。平均而言,主观数据比客观数据更积极。最后,27名受试者中有20人总体上偏爱数字助听器。没有考虑到所涉经费问题。然而,客观数据并不支持这种强烈的主观偏好。原因可能是分析方法(短时间背景噪音中的短句子)不适合数字助听器;测试程序不允许降噪算法适应背景噪声。这两个中心的结果有显著的不同。这种差异至少在一定程度上可以归因于客观测试中相对于背景噪声的语音时间。这说明测试条件对现代长时间常数非线性信号处理助听器至关重要。新一代有源非线性助听器需要开发新的评估技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in children in Costa Rica. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Predictive factors for the severity of tinnitus. Ototoxic interaction between noise and pheomelanin: distortion product otoacoustic emissions after acoustical trauma in chloroquine-treated red, black, and albino guinea pigs. Aging and external ear resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1