Federal funding formulas and the 1980 census.

Public policy Pub Date : 1981-01-01
J L Goodman
{"title":"Federal funding formulas and the 1980 census.","authors":"J L Goodman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distribution of federal funds has achieved equal status with Congressional reapportionment as a motivation and justification for the Census of Population and Housing. This article describes the effects that U.S. population redistribution during the 1970s, as measured by the 1980 Census, will have on the spatial distribution of federal grants-in-aid provided to state and local governments through programs with formula-based funding systems. The conclusion is that funding changes will not match population changes. The overall redistribution of federal grants-in-aid to state and local governments occurring in response to incorporation of 1980 Census population counts into federal funding formulas will be far less than the level of population redistribution since 1970. Use of intercensal data, formula specifications, limited geographic specificity in many formula allocations, and nonformula determinants of formula-based grants all weaken the relationship between Census-measured population change and the receipt of federal funds at the local level. Despite all the intervening factors, it is probably that in many programs there will be some redistribution of funds when the 1980 Census counts are incorporated into the allocation formulas. But the importance of measurement errors and threshold and reclassification effects may equal that of true population change in determining the funds received by local communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":76390,"journal":{"name":"Public policy","volume":"29 2","pages":"179-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distribution of federal funds has achieved equal status with Congressional reapportionment as a motivation and justification for the Census of Population and Housing. This article describes the effects that U.S. population redistribution during the 1970s, as measured by the 1980 Census, will have on the spatial distribution of federal grants-in-aid provided to state and local governments through programs with formula-based funding systems. The conclusion is that funding changes will not match population changes. The overall redistribution of federal grants-in-aid to state and local governments occurring in response to incorporation of 1980 Census population counts into federal funding formulas will be far less than the level of population redistribution since 1970. Use of intercensal data, formula specifications, limited geographic specificity in many formula allocations, and nonformula determinants of formula-based grants all weaken the relationship between Census-measured population change and the receipt of federal funds at the local level. Despite all the intervening factors, it is probably that in many programs there will be some redistribution of funds when the 1980 Census counts are incorporated into the allocation formulas. But the importance of measurement errors and threshold and reclassification effects may equal that of true population change in determining the funds received by local communities.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联邦拨款公式和1980年的人口普查。
作为人口和住房普查的动机和理由,联邦资金的分配与国会的重新分配具有同等的地位。本文描述了1980年人口普查测量的20世纪70年代美国人口再分配对通过基于公式的资助系统的项目向州和地方政府提供的联邦补助金的空间分布的影响。结论是,资金的变化不会与人口的变化相匹配。由于将1980年人口普查数据纳入联邦拨款公式,联邦政府对州和地方政府的援助补助金的总体再分配将远远低于1970年以来的人口再分配水平。普查间数据的使用、公式规格、许多公式分配中有限的地理特殊性以及基于公式的赠款的非公式决定因素都削弱了普查测量的人口变化与地方一级联邦资金接收之间的关系。尽管有这些干扰因素,当1980年的人口普查结果被纳入分配公式时,在许多项目中可能会有一些资金的重新分配。但是,在决定当地社区收到的资金时,测量误差、阈值和重新分类效应的重要性可能与真实人口变化的重要性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
سیاستهای آموزشی و حقوق شهروندی کودکان در ایران شناسایی عوامل مرتبط با پایداری ازدواج در مطالعات ایرانی (1388-1398) اندازهگیری و مشخصهسازی تغییر سیاستهای انرژی در گذر زمان: موردکاوی صنعت برق انگلستان تحلیل الگوی کنشگری دانشکدههای حکمرانی جهان در چارچوب پارادایم های توانمندسازی نقش بازیگران مسلح غیردولتی در سیاستگذاری ایران، ترکیه و عربستان سعودی در خاورمیانه
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1