Suicide and public policy: a critique of the "new consensus".

Journal of bioethics Pub Date : 1982-02-01
R Sherlock
{"title":"Suicide and public policy: a critique of the \"new consensus\".","authors":"R Sherlock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several writers have recently developed proposals calling for a public policy that would allow a number of individuals to commit suicide if they so choose. Suicide, it is argued, is a fundamental matter of personal liberty and as such only very minimal restrictions should be placed on it. In this essay I offer a critique of these views and the public policies they entail. The result is a defense of the general outlines of current professional and legal policies which permit intervention, even coercive intervention, with suicidal persons in almost every case.</p>","PeriodicalId":80021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bioethics","volume":"4 1-2","pages":"58-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several writers have recently developed proposals calling for a public policy that would allow a number of individuals to commit suicide if they so choose. Suicide, it is argued, is a fundamental matter of personal liberty and as such only very minimal restrictions should be placed on it. In this essay I offer a critique of these views and the public policies they entail. The result is a defense of the general outlines of current professional and legal policies which permit intervention, even coercive intervention, with suicidal persons in almost every case.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀与公共政策:对“新共识”的批判。
几位作家最近提出了一项建议,呼吁制定一项公共政策,允许一些人选择自杀。有人认为,自杀是个人自由的基本问题,因此对它的限制应该非常小。在这篇文章中,我对这些观点和它们所带来的公共政策提出了批评。其结果是对当前专业和法律政策的总体概述进行辩护,这些政策允许在几乎所有情况下对自杀者进行干预,甚至是强制干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information constraints in medical encounters. A structured approach to teaching decision-making skills in biomedical ethics. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research. Morals and money. A commentary on Dr. Kennedy's perception of the impact of institutional review boards on cancer research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1