Out-patient letters: requirement and contents.

Effective health care Pub Date : 1985-01-01
D W Young, J Parkes, W A Davis, D Harman, R S Williams
{"title":"Out-patient letters: requirement and contents.","authors":"D W Young,&nbsp;J Parkes,&nbsp;W A Davis,&nbsp;D Harman,&nbsp;R S Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-five general practitioners were interviewed about the contents of out-patient letters. There was universal agreement on the need for the following information: diagnosis, abnormal physical findings, abnormal routine and non-routine test results, changes in treatment, comments on the patient's physical condition and disposal. The contents of 215 out-patient letters were analysed and the results compared with the GPs' views. There was little difference in the letters from medical and surgical clinics. Both were deficient to a limited extent in the reporting of abnormal test results, the reasons for, and significance of investigations, and in detailing the information given to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79874,"journal":{"name":"Effective health care","volume":"2 6","pages":"225-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Effective health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty-five general practitioners were interviewed about the contents of out-patient letters. There was universal agreement on the need for the following information: diagnosis, abnormal physical findings, abnormal routine and non-routine test results, changes in treatment, comments on the patient's physical condition and disposal. The contents of 215 out-patient letters were analysed and the results compared with the GPs' views. There was little difference in the letters from medical and surgical clinics. Both were deficient to a limited extent in the reporting of abnormal test results, the reasons for, and significance of investigations, and in detailing the information given to patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊信笺:要求及内容。
对25名全科医生就门诊信件内容进行了访谈。人们普遍同意需要以下信息:诊断、异常的身体检查结果、异常的常规和非常规检查结果、治疗的变化、对患者身体状况的评论和处置。分析215封门诊信件的内容,并与全科医生的意见进行比较。来自内科和外科诊所的信件几乎没有什么不同。两者在报告异常检测结果、调查的原因和意义以及向患者提供详细信息方面都存在一定程度的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Secondary prevention: screening for breast cancer. A frame-work to co-ordinate research and preventive action. Measuring the impact of health interventions: a review of available instruments. Out-patient letters: requirement and contents. On regulating perceived risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1