Canadian critical care nurses and physical restraints.

B A Leith
{"title":"Canadian critical care nurses and physical restraints.","authors":"B A Leith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While physical restraints are frequently used in Canadian critical care units, a limited number of studies related to this practice have been conducted. In this article, the author describes the findings from a survey about physical restraints which was completed by nurses who attended a 1998 conference of the Manitoba chapter of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses. The purpose of the study was to identify Canadian critical care nurses' knowledge, practice, and attitudes related to the use of physical restraints. Major findings included a mean score of 77% in knowledge of restraints, a lack of uniform restraint practices, and the fact that many nurses experience negative emotions related to the use of restraints. Participants typically used wrist restraints to prevent injury or removal of invasive therapeutic devices. The most commonly suggested alternatives for restraints included constant observation or medications. The results of this survey suggest that critical care nurses require further education in order to improve their knowledge and to standardize nursing practice protocols related to the use of restraints. Further research to identify appropriate restraint alternatives, specifically for critical care, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":79699,"journal":{"name":"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses","volume":"10 1","pages":"10-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Official journal of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While physical restraints are frequently used in Canadian critical care units, a limited number of studies related to this practice have been conducted. In this article, the author describes the findings from a survey about physical restraints which was completed by nurses who attended a 1998 conference of the Manitoba chapter of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses. The purpose of the study was to identify Canadian critical care nurses' knowledge, practice, and attitudes related to the use of physical restraints. Major findings included a mean score of 77% in knowledge of restraints, a lack of uniform restraint practices, and the fact that many nurses experience negative emotions related to the use of restraints. Participants typically used wrist restraints to prevent injury or removal of invasive therapeutic devices. The most commonly suggested alternatives for restraints included constant observation or medications. The results of this survey suggest that critical care nurses require further education in order to improve their knowledge and to standardize nursing practice protocols related to the use of restraints. Further research to identify appropriate restraint alternatives, specifically for critical care, is required.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大重症监护护士和身体约束。
虽然在加拿大的重症监护病房经常使用身体约束,但与这种做法有关的研究数量有限。在这篇文章中,作者描述了一项关于身体约束的调查结果,该调查是由参加1998年加拿大重症护理护士协会马尼托巴分会会议的护士完成的。该研究的目的是确定加拿大重症护理护士的知识,实践和态度有关的使用物理约束。主要发现包括约束知识的平均得分为77%,缺乏统一的约束实践,以及许多护士经历与使用约束相关的负面情绪。参与者通常使用手腕约束来防止受伤或移除侵入性治疗设备。最普遍建议的替代约束包括持续观察或药物治疗。这项调查的结果表明,危重病护理护士需要进一步的教育,以提高他们的知识和规范护理实践协议有关使用约束。需要进一步研究以确定适当的约束替代方案,特别是对重症监护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bridging the gap. Bridging the gap. Canadian critical care nurses and physical restraints. Striving to recapture our previous life: the experience of families with critically ill children. Do-not-resuscitate patients in critical care: moral and ethical considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1