[Outcomes of nursing education. Retrospective evaluation after five years in working life].

Hoitotiede Pub Date : 1998-01-01
S Solante, H Leino-Kilpi
{"title":"[Outcomes of nursing education. Retrospective evaluation after five years in working life].","authors":"S Solante,&nbsp;H Leino-Kilpi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the quality of outcomes of nursing education. The evaluation takes place five years after the graduation and it allows to evaluate the outcomes from the perspective on nursing practice and to identify the discrepancies between education and working life. This kind of evaluation is very rare in nursing. The data were collected in 1996 by postal questionnaires. The questionnaire was divided into following areas: 1) theoretical knowledge base, 2) interactive skills, 3) educational skills, 4) practical nursing skills and 5) collaborative skills. The sample consisted of graduating nursing students in Finland 1990 (altogether 522). The response rate was 68% (n = 354). The analysis was done statistically. According the results the respondents had the best skills in practical nursing skills, in collaboration and in theoretical knowledge base. The worst skills they had in interactive skills, especially with patients having abuse problems and in educational skills. The results indicate the problems and advantages of existing education and give basis for development.</p>","PeriodicalId":77161,"journal":{"name":"Hoitotiede","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hoitotiede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the quality of outcomes of nursing education. The evaluation takes place five years after the graduation and it allows to evaluate the outcomes from the perspective on nursing practice and to identify the discrepancies between education and working life. This kind of evaluation is very rare in nursing. The data were collected in 1996 by postal questionnaires. The questionnaire was divided into following areas: 1) theoretical knowledge base, 2) interactive skills, 3) educational skills, 4) practical nursing skills and 5) collaborative skills. The sample consisted of graduating nursing students in Finland 1990 (altogether 522). The response rate was 68% (n = 354). The analysis was done statistically. According the results the respondents had the best skills in practical nursing skills, in collaboration and in theoretical knowledge base. The worst skills they had in interactive skills, especially with patients having abuse problems and in educational skills. The results indicate the problems and advantages of existing education and give basis for development.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理教育的结果。工作5年后的回顾性评估]。
本研究的目的是评估护理教育结果的质量。评估在毕业五年后进行,它允许从护理实践的角度评估结果,并确定教育和工作生活之间的差异。这种评价在护理中是非常罕见的。这些数据是在1996年通过邮寄问卷收集的。问卷分为:1)理论知识基础,2)互动能力,3)教育能力,4)护理实践能力,5)协作能力。样本包括芬兰1990年毕业的护理专业学生(共522人)。有效率为68% (n = 354)。分析是用统计学方法进行的。结果显示,被调查者在护理实践技能、协作能力和理论知识基础方面的水平最高。他们最糟糕的技能是互动技能,尤其是与有虐待问题的病人互动以及教育技能。结果表明了现有教育存在的问题和优势,为今后的发展提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Psychological load factors and control in the work of occupational health nurses]. [The work of a midwife-public health nurse in northern Finland in 1950-1987]. [Good nursing care in the postnatal wards--mothers' views on the aspect of nursing care]. Nurse educators' well-being at work in Finland. University of Kuopio and University of Turku. Share a Fulbright professor in 1997-1998.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1