MRI validation of the accuracy of tympanometric gradient for the diagnosis of OME.

C M Alper, W J Doyle
{"title":"MRI validation of the accuracy of tympanometric gradient for the diagnosis of OME.","authors":"C M Alper,&nbsp;W J Doyle","doi":"10.3109/03005369909090104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tympanometry provides a rapid, non-invasive and objective assessment of middle ear (ME) status and is widely used for the clinical diagnosis and follow-up of otitis media with effusion (OME). ME pressure, acoustic admittance and tympanometric gradient are the main test parameters used in making assignments to diagnostic classes (i.e. presence or absence of effusion, effusion quantity). Of these, the tympanometric gradient was suggested to be more sensitive to the presence of effusion, but this has not been demonstrated conclusively and no standard definition of that gradient is accepted. In this study, 10 cynomolgus monkeys with experimental OME were used to compare the diagnosis of OME made using three different methods to estimate tympanometric gradient with that provided by simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the ME. All three methods of tympanometric gradient measurement were highly correlated with the quantity of ME effusion measured by the MRI. Although not significant, the MRI results were better correlated with those for the 'width' method when compared to either the 'difference' or the 'ratio' method of gradient estimation. This study demonstrates the use of MRI as a gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of other methods to diagnose ME effusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"33 4","pages":"233-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005369909090104","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005369909090104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Tympanometry provides a rapid, non-invasive and objective assessment of middle ear (ME) status and is widely used for the clinical diagnosis and follow-up of otitis media with effusion (OME). ME pressure, acoustic admittance and tympanometric gradient are the main test parameters used in making assignments to diagnostic classes (i.e. presence or absence of effusion, effusion quantity). Of these, the tympanometric gradient was suggested to be more sensitive to the presence of effusion, but this has not been demonstrated conclusively and no standard definition of that gradient is accepted. In this study, 10 cynomolgus monkeys with experimental OME were used to compare the diagnosis of OME made using three different methods to estimate tympanometric gradient with that provided by simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the ME. All three methods of tympanometric gradient measurement were highly correlated with the quantity of ME effusion measured by the MRI. Although not significant, the MRI results were better correlated with those for the 'width' method when compared to either the 'difference' or the 'ratio' method of gradient estimation. This study demonstrates the use of MRI as a gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of other methods to diagnose ME effusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓室梯度对OME诊断准确性的MRI验证。
鼓室测定仪提供了一种快速、无创、客观的中耳状态评估方法,广泛应用于中耳炎积液的临床诊断和随访。ME压力、声导纳和鼓室测量梯度是确定诊断类别(即有无积液、积液量)时使用的主要测试参数。其中,鼓室梯度被认为对积液的存在更敏感,但这尚未得到最终证明,也没有接受该梯度的标准定义。本研究以10只实验性OME食蟹猴为研究对象,比较了三种不同的鼓室梯度估计方法对OME的诊断结果与ME同步磁共振成像(MRI)的诊断结果。三种鼓室梯度测量方法均与MRI测量的ME积液量高度相关。虽然不显著,但与梯度估计的“差”或“比”方法相比,MRI结果与“宽度”方法的结果具有更好的相关性。本研究表明,MRI作为评估其他方法诊断ME积液准确性的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards. Assessment of aided ABR thresholds before cochlear implantation. Community-based validation of the McCormick Toy Test. Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1