Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. nov. and Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov., two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy.

B A Brown, B Springer, V A Steingrube, R W Wilson, G E Pfyffer, M J Garcia, M C Menendez, B Rodriguez-Salgado, K C Jost, S H Chiu, G O Onyi, E C Böttger, R J Wallace
{"title":"Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. nov. and Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov., two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the International Working Group on Mycobacterial Taxonomy.","authors":"B A Brown,&nbsp;B Springer,&nbsp;V A Steingrube,&nbsp;R W Wilson,&nbsp;G E Pfyffer,&nbsp;M J Garcia,&nbsp;M C Menendez,&nbsp;B Rodriguez-Salgado,&nbsp;K C Jost,&nbsp;S H Chiu,&nbsp;G O Onyi,&nbsp;E C Böttger,&nbsp;R J Wallace","doi":"10.1099/00207713-49-4-1493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous investigations demonstrated three taxonomic groups among 22 clinical isolates of Mycobacterium smegmatis. These studies were expanded to 71 clinical isolates, of which 35 (49%) (group 1) were identical to five ATCC reference strains including the type strain ATCC 19420T. Twenty-eight isolates (39%) were group 2, and eight isolates (11%) were group 3. Isolates of groups 2 and 3 were most often associated with post-traumatic or post-surgical wound infections including osteomyelitis, were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, imipenem and the tetracyclines, variably resistant to clarithromycin, and susceptible (group 1), intermediately resistant (group 2) or resistant (group 3) to tobramycin. The three groups were similar by routine biochemical and growth characteristics, but had different mycolic acid dimethoxy-4-coumarinylmethyl ester elution patterns by HPLC and different PCR-restriction enzyme patterns of a 439 bp fragment of the hsp-65 gene. Group 3 isolates differed from group 1 by 18 bp by 16S rRNA sequencing and exhibited < 25% homology by DNA-DNA hybridization, being most closely related to Mycobacterium mageritense. The 16S rRNA of group 1 and group 2 isolates differed by only 3 bp, but by DNA-DNA hybridization they exhibited only 40% homology. The following names are proposed: Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov. for group 2 isolates (type strain ATCC 700504T = MO69T), Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. nov. for group 3 isolates (type strain ATCC 700010T = MO739T) and Mycobacterium smegmatis sensu stricto for group 1 isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14428,"journal":{"name":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","volume":"49 Pt 4 ","pages":"1493-511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1493","citationCount":"176","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 176

Abstract

Previous investigations demonstrated three taxonomic groups among 22 clinical isolates of Mycobacterium smegmatis. These studies were expanded to 71 clinical isolates, of which 35 (49%) (group 1) were identical to five ATCC reference strains including the type strain ATCC 19420T. Twenty-eight isolates (39%) were group 2, and eight isolates (11%) were group 3. Isolates of groups 2 and 3 were most often associated with post-traumatic or post-surgical wound infections including osteomyelitis, were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, imipenem and the tetracyclines, variably resistant to clarithromycin, and susceptible (group 1), intermediately resistant (group 2) or resistant (group 3) to tobramycin. The three groups were similar by routine biochemical and growth characteristics, but had different mycolic acid dimethoxy-4-coumarinylmethyl ester elution patterns by HPLC and different PCR-restriction enzyme patterns of a 439 bp fragment of the hsp-65 gene. Group 3 isolates differed from group 1 by 18 bp by 16S rRNA sequencing and exhibited < 25% homology by DNA-DNA hybridization, being most closely related to Mycobacterium mageritense. The 16S rRNA of group 1 and group 2 isolates differed by only 3 bp, but by DNA-DNA hybridization they exhibited only 40% homology. The following names are proposed: Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov. for group 2 isolates (type strain ATCC 700504T = MO69T), Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. nov. for group 3 isolates (type strain ATCC 700010T = MO739T) and Mycobacterium smegmatis sensu stricto for group 1 isolates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃林斯基分枝杆菌和古地分枝杆菌,与耻垢分枝杆菌相关的两个快速生长的新物种,与人类伤口感染有关:国际分枝杆菌分类工作组的合作研究。
以往的调查显示,22个临床分离的耻垢分枝杆菌有3个分类类群。这些研究扩大到71株临床分离株,其中35株(49%)(第1组)与5株ATCC参考菌株相同,包括型菌株ATCC 19420T。2组28株(39%),3组8株(11%)。第2组和第3组的分离株最常与创伤后或手术后伤口感染相关,包括骨髓炎,对磺胺甲恶唑、阿米卡星、亚胺培南和四环素敏感,对克拉霉素可变耐药,对妥布霉素敏感(1组)、中等耐药(2组)或耐药(3组)。3组的常规生化和生长特征相似,但HPLC法对霉菌酸二甲氧基-4-香豆素甲酯的洗脱模式不同,hsp-65基因439bp片段的pcr -限制性内切酶模式不同。组3与组1的16S rRNA测序差异为18 bp, DNA-DNA杂交同源性< 25%,与马格利特分枝杆菌亲缘关系最密切。1组和2组分离物的16S rRNA差异仅为3bp,但DNA-DNA杂交显示其同源性仅为40%。建议将其命名为:第2组分离物为good dii分枝杆菌(ATCC 700504T = MO69T型菌株),第3组分离物为wollinskyi分枝杆菌(ATCC 700010T = MO739T型菌株),第1组分离物为耻垢杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of members of a Borrelia afzelii-related group isolated from Ixodes nipponensis in Korea as Borrelia valaisiana. Comparison of partial malolactic enzyme gene sequences for phylogenetic analysis of some lactic acid bacteria species and relationships with the malic enzyme. Helcococcus ovis sp. nov., a gram-positive organism from sheep. The phylogenetic position of Serratia, Buttiauxella and some other genera of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Dolosicoccus paucivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human blood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1