Gauge Capability Analysis: classical versus ANOVA.

J Antony, G Knowles, P Roberts
{"title":"Gauge Capability Analysis: classical versus ANOVA.","authors":"J Antony,&nbsp;G Knowles,&nbsp;P Roberts","doi":"10.1080/105294199277842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to use Statistical Process Control (SPC) efficiently and effectively in today's modern industrial environment, it is essential to analyze and determine the extent of gauge variability. The variation that occurs on a control chart is essentially a combination of product and gauge variation. Studies of measurement or gauge variation are absolutely a waste of resources unless they can lead to a substantial reduction in process variability or to an improvement in process and product quality. The goal of gauge capability analysis is an understanding and quantification of the various sources of variability present in the measurement process. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the fundamental difference between Classical Gauge Capability Analysis (CGCA) and the use of a more powerful approach based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The author recommends that the latter approach is more useful and powerful in the presence of an interaction between the parts and the operators involved in the measurement process. An example is illustrated in the paper to demonstrate the two approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"6 3","pages":"173-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/105294199277842","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/105294199277842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

In order to use Statistical Process Control (SPC) efficiently and effectively in today's modern industrial environment, it is essential to analyze and determine the extent of gauge variability. The variation that occurs on a control chart is essentially a combination of product and gauge variation. Studies of measurement or gauge variation are absolutely a waste of resources unless they can lead to a substantial reduction in process variability or to an improvement in process and product quality. The goal of gauge capability analysis is an understanding and quantification of the various sources of variability present in the measurement process. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the fundamental difference between Classical Gauge Capability Analysis (CGCA) and the use of a more powerful approach based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The author recommends that the latter approach is more useful and powerful in the presence of an interaction between the parts and the operators involved in the measurement process. An example is illustrated in the paper to demonstrate the two approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量能力分析:经典与方差分析。
为了在当今的现代工业环境中高效地使用统计过程控制(SPC),分析和确定仪表变异性的程度是必不可少的。发生在控制图上的变化本质上是产品和量规变化的结合。测量或量规变化的研究绝对是对资源的浪费,除非它们能导致过程可变性的实质性减少或过程和产品质量的改进。测量能力分析的目标是理解和量化测量过程中存在的各种可变性的来源。本文的目的是说明经典标准能力分析(CGCA)和使用基于方差分析(ANOVA)的更强大的方法之间的根本区别。作者建议,后一种方法在涉及测量过程的部件和操作人员之间存在交互作用时更有用和强大。文中举例说明了这两种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Establishing tolerance levels for customer complaints. Major issues in quality assessment and improvement of clinical hyperbaric services: an international perspective. The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come? Evaluation of customer satisfaction level of different projects. Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1