Cream-skimming in deregulated social health insurance: evidence from Switzerland.

K Beck, P Zweifel
{"title":"Cream-skimming in deregulated social health insurance: evidence from Switzerland.","authors":"K Beck,&nbsp;P Zweifel","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4615-5681-7_11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policymakers fear that health insurers when exposed to competition will engage in cream-skimming (i.e. selection of good risks) rather than trying to improve their benefit to premium ratio. This fear surfaced also when Swiss federal government proposed pro-competitive Law on social health insurance, which barely passed a popular referendum in 1994. While a risk equalization mechanism based on age, gender, and place of residence has already been created, there is a considerable interest in improving its formula. This paper shows that a dummy variable indicating an individual's death during the period of observation causes the coefficient of determination to jump from 0.039 to 0.111. More-over, simulations of the risk selection process suggest that risk equalization should be made a permanent institution rather than being limited to a life of 10 years as prescribed by present legislation. In fact, the formula in use, with all its shortcomings, can be shown to neutralize to a great extent insurer interest in cream skimming provided he takes a longer-run view.</p>","PeriodicalId":79866,"journal":{"name":"Developments in health economics and public policy","volume":"6 ","pages":"211-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in health economics and public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5681-7_11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Policymakers fear that health insurers when exposed to competition will engage in cream-skimming (i.e. selection of good risks) rather than trying to improve their benefit to premium ratio. This fear surfaced also when Swiss federal government proposed pro-competitive Law on social health insurance, which barely passed a popular referendum in 1994. While a risk equalization mechanism based on age, gender, and place of residence has already been created, there is a considerable interest in improving its formula. This paper shows that a dummy variable indicating an individual's death during the period of observation causes the coefficient of determination to jump from 0.039 to 0.111. More-over, simulations of the risk selection process suggest that risk equalization should be made a permanent institution rather than being limited to a life of 10 years as prescribed by present legislation. In fact, the formula in use, with all its shortcomings, can be shown to neutralize to a great extent insurer interest in cream skimming provided he takes a longer-run view.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放松管制的社会健康保险中的撇脂现象:来自瑞士的证据。
政策制定者担心,健康保险公司在面临竞争时,会采取撇脂(即选择优质风险)的做法,而不是努力提高其收益与保费的比率。当瑞士联邦政府在1994年提出关于社会健康保险的促进竞争的法律时,这种担忧也浮出水面,该法律在全民公决中勉强通过。虽然已经建立了一种基于年龄、性别和居住地的风险均摊机制,但人们对改进其公式非常感兴趣。本文表明,一个表示个体在观察期间死亡的虚拟变量使决定系数从0.039跃升到0.111。此外,对风险选择过程的模拟表明,应该使风险均衡成为一种永久性的制度,而不是象现行立法规定的那样限于10年的期限。事实上,目前使用的配方,尽管有缺点,但可以证明,如果保险公司从更长远的角度来看,它在很大程度上抵消了保险公司对脱脂奶油的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Health care provision and patient mobility. Health integration in the European Union. Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care. Implications of the EU patients' rights directive in cross-border healthcare on the German sickness fund system. The possible effects of health professional mobility on access to care for patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1