Cross-cultural adaptation of a health status classification system in children with cancer. First results of the French adaptation of the Health Utilities Index Marks 2 and 3.

C Le Galès, N Costet, J C Gentet, C Kalifa, D Frappaz, C Edan, E Sariban, D Plantaz, F Doz
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation of a health status classification system in children with cancer. First results of the French adaptation of the Health Utilities Index Marks 2 and 3.","authors":"C Le Galès,&nbsp;N Costet,&nbsp;J C Gentet,&nbsp;C Kalifa,&nbsp;D Frappaz,&nbsp;C Edan,&nbsp;E Sariban,&nbsp;D Plantaz,&nbsp;F Doz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to adapt and validate the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI 2) and HUI 3 health status classification systems self-report questionnaire in a population of children with cancer, a group of 42 children already included in a multi-centre database designed by the Group on Brain Tumors in Children of the French Society for Pediatric Oncology. Children were recruited during a routine consultation. Most of them had completed treatment. The version of the questionnaire for French adults was adapted linguistically for children. Open-ended queries by children about the comprehensiveness of the questions and very low non-response rates showed a good acceptability of the questionnaire. The main psychometric properties of the HUI 2 and HUI 3 classification systems were assessed in 3 groups of raters (child, parent, physician): construct validity was tested against the rating of the child's health state on a Likert scale and through comparison with clinical data, and internal consistency was determined through multi-trait analysis. Weighted and unweighted kappa values were used to measure the inter-rater agreement between the child's, parent's and physician's assessment of the child's health state. The convergent validity was satisfactory, with better results when the physician's assessment was used. The most affected attributes were the expected ones (i.e., cognition, pain and emotion). Disagreement was observed between the 3 raters, more often in the same direction: taking the child's assessment as the reference, the parents tended to under-estimate the health status while physicians tended to over-estimate it.</p>","PeriodicalId":77178,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement","volume":"12 ","pages":"112-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer. Supplement = Journal international du cancer. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective was to adapt and validate the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI 2) and HUI 3 health status classification systems self-report questionnaire in a population of children with cancer, a group of 42 children already included in a multi-centre database designed by the Group on Brain Tumors in Children of the French Society for Pediatric Oncology. Children were recruited during a routine consultation. Most of them had completed treatment. The version of the questionnaire for French adults was adapted linguistically for children. Open-ended queries by children about the comprehensiveness of the questions and very low non-response rates showed a good acceptability of the questionnaire. The main psychometric properties of the HUI 2 and HUI 3 classification systems were assessed in 3 groups of raters (child, parent, physician): construct validity was tested against the rating of the child's health state on a Likert scale and through comparison with clinical data, and internal consistency was determined through multi-trait analysis. Weighted and unweighted kappa values were used to measure the inter-rater agreement between the child's, parent's and physician's assessment of the child's health state. The convergent validity was satisfactory, with better results when the physician's assessment was used. The most affected attributes were the expected ones (i.e., cognition, pain and emotion). Disagreement was observed between the 3 raters, more often in the same direction: taking the child's assessment as the reference, the parents tended to under-estimate the health status while physicians tended to over-estimate it.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症儿童健康状况分类系统的跨文化适应。法国对卫生设施指数的调整的第一个结果是2分和3分。
我们的目的是在患有癌症的儿童人群中采用和验证健康效用指数标记2 (HUI 2)和HUI 3健康状况分类系统自我报告问卷,一组42名儿童已被纳入由法国儿科肿瘤学会儿童脑肿瘤小组设计的多中心数据库。儿童是在一次例行咨询中被招募的。他们中的大多数人已经完成了治疗。针对法国成年人的调查问卷经过了语言上的修改,以适用于儿童。儿童对问题的全面性的开放式提问和极低的无应答率表明问卷的可接受性很好。采用三组评分者(儿童、家长、医生)对HUI 2和HUI 3分类系统的主要心理测量特性进行评估:通过李克特量表对儿童健康状况的评分和与临床资料的比较检验结构效度,并通过多特质分析确定内部一致性。采用加权和未加权kappa值来衡量儿童、家长和医生对儿童健康状况的评估之间的等级一致性。收敛效度令人满意,采用医师评价效果更好。受影响最大的属性是预期属性(即认知、痛苦和情绪)。3位评价者在健康状况评价上存在差异,且多呈相同方向:以儿童评价为参照,父母倾向于低估儿童健康状况,而医生倾向于高估儿童健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Cross-cultural adaptation of a health status classification system in children with cancer. First results of the French adaptation of the Health Utilities Index Marks 2 and 3. Preliminary translation and cultural adaptation of Health Utilities Index questionnaires for application in Argentina. Measuring health-related quality of life in childhood cancer: lessons from the workshop (discussion). Development of the Royal Marsden Hospital paediatric oncology quality of life questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1