Upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the management of small bowel obstruction--a prospective randomised study.

B T Fevang, D Jensen, J Fevang, K Søndenaa, K Ovrebø, O Røkke, H Gislasson, K Svanes, A Viste
{"title":"Upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the management of small bowel obstruction--a prospective randomised study.","authors":"B T Fevang,&nbsp;D Jensen,&nbsp;J Fevang,&nbsp;K Søndenaa,&nbsp;K Ovrebø,&nbsp;O Røkke,&nbsp;H Gislasson,&nbsp;K Svanes,&nbsp;A Viste","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out whether contrast radiography helps to resolve small bowel obstruction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Norway.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>98 consecutive patients with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and a plain abdominal radiograph that confirmed the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The patients were randomly allocated to receive a mixture of barium and sodium diatrizoate (Gastrografin) (n = 48) or not (n = 50). Both groups were followed up clinically and by repeated abdominal films.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Non-operative resolution of small bowel obstruction; number of patients with strangulated bowel; bowel resections; mortality; complications; hospital stay; and time from admission to operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of non-operative resolution (31/48 in contrast group, 35/50 in control group, OR: 0.89), strangulation obstruction (1/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.24), bowel resection (3/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.76), complications (8/48 in contrast group, 5/50 in control group, OR: 1.80), mortality (3/48 in contrast group, 1/50 in control group, OR: 3.26), and hospital stay (0-7 days: 34/48 in contrast group, 38/50 in control group, p = 0.95). The contrast group had a shorter interval between admission and operation than the control group (0-24 hours: 12/48 in contrast group, 3/50 in control group, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contrast examination did not contribute to the resolution of small bowel obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":"166 1","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009681","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

Objective: To find out whether contrast radiography helps to resolve small bowel obstruction.

Design: Prospective randomised trial.

Setting: University hospital, Norway.

Subjects: 98 consecutive patients with symptoms of small bowel obstruction and a plain abdominal radiograph that confirmed the diagnosis.

Interventions: The patients were randomly allocated to receive a mixture of barium and sodium diatrizoate (Gastrografin) (n = 48) or not (n = 50). Both groups were followed up clinically and by repeated abdominal films.

Main outcome measures: Non-operative resolution of small bowel obstruction; number of patients with strangulated bowel; bowel resections; mortality; complications; hospital stay; and time from admission to operation.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of non-operative resolution (31/48 in contrast group, 35/50 in control group, OR: 0.89), strangulation obstruction (1/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.24), bowel resection (3/48 in contrast group, 4/50 in control group, OR: 0.76), complications (8/48 in contrast group, 5/50 in control group, OR: 1.80), mortality (3/48 in contrast group, 1/50 in control group, OR: 3.26), and hospital stay (0-7 days: 34/48 in contrast group, 38/50 in control group, p = 0.95). The contrast group had a shorter interval between admission and operation than the control group (0-24 hours: 12/48 in contrast group, 3/50 in control group, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: The contrast examination did not contribute to the resolution of small bowel obstruction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小肠梗阻治疗的上胃肠道对比研究——一项前瞻性随机研究。
目的:探讨造影是否有助于消除小肠梗阻。设计:前瞻性随机试验。地点:挪威大学医院。研究对象:连续98例有小肠梗阻症状并经腹部平片证实诊断的患者。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受钡和三角化钠混合治疗(n = 48)或不接受治疗(n = 50)。两组患者均接受临床随访和腹部重复影像检查。主要观察指标:小肠梗阻非手术解决;肠绞窄患者数;肠切除术;死亡率;并发症;住院;以及从入院到手术的时间。结果:两组间非手术消退发生率(对照组31/48,对照组35/50,OR: 0.89)、绞窄性梗阻发生率(对照组1/48,对照组4/50,OR: 0.24)、肠切除术发生率(对照组3/48,对照组4/50,OR: 0.76)、并发症发生率(对照组8/48,对照组5/50,OR: 1.80)、死亡率发生率(对照组3/48,对照组1/50,OR: 0.80)差异无统计学意义。3.26),住院时间(0-7天:对照组34/48,对照组38/50,p = 0.95)。对照组患者入院至手术时间间隔较对照组短(0 ~ 24 h:对照组12/48,对照组3/50,p = 0.005)。结论:造影检查对小肠梗阻的解决没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360 degree fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Factors that affect the variability in heart rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Risk factors for severe postoperative hypocalcaemia after operations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 556 on acute necrotising pancreatitis in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1