Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis.

K Bosscha, P F Hulstaert, M R Visser, T J van Vroonhoven, C van der Werken
{"title":"Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis.","authors":"K Bosscha,&nbsp;P F Hulstaert,&nbsp;M R Visser,&nbsp;T J van Vroonhoven,&nbsp;C van der Werken","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the results of open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations in severe bacterial peritonitis after perforation or anastomotic disruption of the digestive tract.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Hospital, The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>67 consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hospital morbidity and mortality, long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38 patients developed multiple organ failure (MOF), but 29 needed only ventilatory and inotropic support. The mean number of re-operations was nine. 16 patients developed severe bleeding and 16 fistulas. In-hospital mortality was 42% (n = 28). Long-term morbidity, particularly the number of abdominal wall defects (n = 10), was considerable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations, mortality of severe bacterial peritonitis still continues to be too high, and both short and long-term morbidity are appreciable. The value of open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations rests only on the clinical observation that other conventional surgical treatments of severe bacterial peritonitis often fail.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":"166 1","pages":"44-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009690","citationCount":"106","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 106

Abstract

Objective: To assess the results of open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations in severe bacterial peritonitis after perforation or anastomotic disruption of the digestive tract.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: University Hospital, The Netherlands.

Subjects: 67 consecutive patients.

Interventions: Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations.

Main outcome measures: Hospital morbidity and mortality, long-term follow-up.

Results: 38 patients developed multiple organ failure (MOF), but 29 needed only ventilatory and inotropic support. The mean number of re-operations was nine. 16 patients developed severe bleeding and 16 fistulas. In-hospital mortality was 42% (n = 28). Long-term morbidity, particularly the number of abdominal wall defects (n = 10), was considerable.

Conclusion: Despite open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations, mortality of severe bacterial peritonitis still continues to be too high, and both short and long-term morbidity are appreciable. The value of open management of the abdomen and planned re-operations rests only on the clinical observation that other conventional surgical treatments of severe bacterial peritonitis often fail.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症细菌性腹膜炎的腹部开放治疗及计划再手术。
目的:探讨消化道穿孔或吻合口破裂后重症细菌性腹膜炎开腹治疗及计划再手术的效果。设计:回顾性研究。地点:荷兰大学医院。受试者:67例连续患者。干预措施:腹部开放治疗和计划的再手术。主要结局指标:医院发病率和死亡率,长期随访。结果:38例患者出现多器官功能衰竭(MOF), 29例仅需要通气和肌力支持。平均再手术次数为9次。16例出现大出血,16例出现瘘管。住院死亡率为42% (n = 28)。长期发病率,特别是腹壁缺损的数量(n = 10)是相当可观的。结论:重型细菌性腹膜炎虽已开腹治疗并计划再次手术,但病死率仍居高不下,短期和长期发病率均可观。腹部开腹治疗和计划再手术的价值仅在于临床观察,其他常规手术治疗严重细菌性腹膜炎往往失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360 degree fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Factors that affect the variability in heart rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Risk factors for severe postoperative hypocalcaemia after operations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 556 on acute necrotising pancreatitis in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1