Meperidine utilization and compliance with Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines in a tertiary care hospital.

J E Pellegrini, J Paice, M Faut-Callahan
{"title":"Meperidine utilization and compliance with Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines in a tertiary care hospital.","authors":"J E Pellegrini,&nbsp;J Paice,&nbsp;M Faut-Callahan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) established guidelines for the use of meperidine (demerol), a common inpatient analgesic. These guidelines define standards of care for acute and chronic cancer pain management and address many of the problems with meperidine and its metabolite, normeperidine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether meperidine was prescribed in compliance with AHCPR guidelines, whether patients exhibited any adverse reactions to meperidine, and to determine the analgesic efficacy of meperidine. Three hundred inpatient charts were reviewed and identified meperidine as the primary analgesic in 157 nonobstetric inpatients. Age, sex, weight, dosing interval, route of administration, duration of meperidine use, serum chemistry values, primary diagnosis, associated medical conditions, and medications concurrently being taken with meperidine were the parameters analyzed. An interview was conducted to ascertain medical and drug history, chronicity of pain syndromes, analgesic drug history, and analgesic efficacy. A visual analog scale for pain (range = 0 to 10) and an analgesic satisfaction survey (range = 1 to 5) were used. Of 157 patients, 124 (79.8%) were in conflict with AHCPR guidelines. The most frequent conflict was found to be suboptimal dosing regimen and treatment of chronic pain. Often concurrent analgesics were given with the meperidine to achieve adequate analgesia. Higher analgesic satisfaction scores were noted when meperidine was given with concurrent analgesics. Meperidine also was administered to patients in renal failure or with medications contraindicated with meperidine use. No significant adverse effects were noted with meperidine use in this sample population other than an increased incidence of confusion in the elderly population.</p>","PeriodicalId":77087,"journal":{"name":"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists","volume":"10 4","pages":"174-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) established guidelines for the use of meperidine (demerol), a common inpatient analgesic. These guidelines define standards of care for acute and chronic cancer pain management and address many of the problems with meperidine and its metabolite, normeperidine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether meperidine was prescribed in compliance with AHCPR guidelines, whether patients exhibited any adverse reactions to meperidine, and to determine the analgesic efficacy of meperidine. Three hundred inpatient charts were reviewed and identified meperidine as the primary analgesic in 157 nonobstetric inpatients. Age, sex, weight, dosing interval, route of administration, duration of meperidine use, serum chemistry values, primary diagnosis, associated medical conditions, and medications concurrently being taken with meperidine were the parameters analyzed. An interview was conducted to ascertain medical and drug history, chronicity of pain syndromes, analgesic drug history, and analgesic efficacy. A visual analog scale for pain (range = 0 to 10) and an analgesic satisfaction survey (range = 1 to 5) were used. Of 157 patients, 124 (79.8%) were in conflict with AHCPR guidelines. The most frequent conflict was found to be suboptimal dosing regimen and treatment of chronic pain. Often concurrent analgesics were given with the meperidine to achieve adequate analgesia. Higher analgesic satisfaction scores were noted when meperidine was given with concurrent analgesics. Meperidine also was administered to patients in renal failure or with medications contraindicated with meperidine use. No significant adverse effects were noted with meperidine use in this sample population other than an increased incidence of confusion in the elderly population.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级保健医院对哌替啶的使用及对卫生保健政策和研究机构指导方针的遵守情况。
卫生保健政策和研究局(AHCPR)制定了哌替啶(杜冷丁)的使用指南,哌替啶是一种常见的住院镇痛药。这些指南定义了急性和慢性癌症疼痛管理的护理标准,并解决了与哌替啶及其代谢物去甲哌替啶有关的许多问题。本研究的目的是确定哌替啶的处方是否符合AHCPR指南,患者是否出现哌替啶的不良反应,并确定哌替啶的镇痛效果。我们回顾了300例住院病例,并确定了157例非产科住院患者以哌替啶为主要镇痛药。分析了年龄、性别、体重、给药间隔、给药途径、使用时间、血清化学值、初步诊断、相关医疗条件和与哌替啶同时服用的药物。通过访谈确定患者的病史和用药史、疼痛综合征的慢性性、镇痛药物史和镇痛疗效。采用视觉模拟疼痛量表(范围= 0至10)和镇痛满意度调查(范围= 1至5)。157例患者中,124例(79.8%)与AHCPR指南相冲突。最常见的冲突是次优给药方案和慢性疼痛的治疗。为了达到充分的镇痛效果,常与哌替啶同时使用镇痛药。当哌替啶与其他镇痛药同时使用时,镇痛满意度得分较高。哌替啶也适用于肾功能衰竭或使用哌替啶禁忌症的患者。在该样本人群中,除了老年人群中混淆发生率增加外,未发现使用哌替啶的显著不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Essential Clinical Anesthesia Review: Management of the difficult airway Preemptive analgesia: its role in posterior spine surgery Anesthetic drug interactions. Quarterly update. Health care delivery and change: thoughts on Lema's "... of dinosaurs, dodos and anesthesia personnel". Differential diagnosis of postdural puncture headache in the parturient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1