Estimating the balance of general practice versus family planning clinic coverage of contraception services in London.

M Bardsley, M Newman, D Morgan, B Jacobson
{"title":"Estimating the balance of general practice versus family planning clinic coverage of contraception services in London.","authors":"M Bardsley,&nbsp;M Newman,&nbsp;D Morgan,&nbsp;B Jacobson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare levels of provision of contraception from general practice and family planning clinics for the populations of the 32 London Boroughs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective analysis of routine activity data, including the estimated numbers of first attendance, for 295 family planning clinics (managed by 28 NHS Trusts) and more than 1800 GP partnerships in Greater London, supplemented by data from a survey of family planning clinics. The results were expressed as the estimated percentage of women aged 16-49 obtaining advice on contraception from GPs and family planning clinics. These results were compared to those expected based on results in the General Household Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across London in 1995/96, 12% of women aged 16-49 obtained contraception services from family planning clinics, and 24% obtained contraception services from a GP. At a borough level there was variation from 11% to 25% in coverage by family planning clinics, and from 11% to 41% in coverage by GPs. Estimates of the proportion of women in this age group not using NHS-provided medical or surgical contraception ranged from 0 to 30%. Across all boroughs, there was no consistent relationship between levels of GP activity and family planning clinic activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate substantial variations between boroughs in the proportion of women using NHS-provided medical or surgical methods of contraception. The absence of any clear inverse relationship between activity in family planning clinics and activity in general practice suggests that changes to one will not be compensated by changes in the other. More specifically, health authorities that opt to purchase lower levels of family planning clinic activity cannot assume that women may opt to use GPs as an alternative. Such a strategy may increase the likelihood that women who would have used family planning clinic services will either not use contraception at all, or will use less effective 'over the counter' methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 1","pages":"21-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of family planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare levels of provision of contraception from general practice and family planning clinics for the populations of the 32 London Boroughs.

Method: Retrospective analysis of routine activity data, including the estimated numbers of first attendance, for 295 family planning clinics (managed by 28 NHS Trusts) and more than 1800 GP partnerships in Greater London, supplemented by data from a survey of family planning clinics. The results were expressed as the estimated percentage of women aged 16-49 obtaining advice on contraception from GPs and family planning clinics. These results were compared to those expected based on results in the General Household Survey.

Results: Across London in 1995/96, 12% of women aged 16-49 obtained contraception services from family planning clinics, and 24% obtained contraception services from a GP. At a borough level there was variation from 11% to 25% in coverage by family planning clinics, and from 11% to 41% in coverage by GPs. Estimates of the proportion of women in this age group not using NHS-provided medical or surgical contraception ranged from 0 to 30%. Across all boroughs, there was no consistent relationship between levels of GP activity and family planning clinic activity.

Conclusion: The results indicate substantial variations between boroughs in the proportion of women using NHS-provided medical or surgical methods of contraception. The absence of any clear inverse relationship between activity in family planning clinics and activity in general practice suggests that changes to one will not be compensated by changes in the other. More specifically, health authorities that opt to purchase lower levels of family planning clinic activity cannot assume that women may opt to use GPs as an alternative. Such a strategy may increase the likelihood that women who would have used family planning clinic services will either not use contraception at all, or will use less effective 'over the counter' methods.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计一般做法与计划生育诊所在伦敦避孕服务覆盖率的平衡。
目的:比较32个伦敦行政区人口的普通诊所和计划生育诊所提供避孕的水平。方法:回顾性分析大伦敦地区295家计划生育诊所(由28家NHS信托基金管理)和1800多家全科医生合作伙伴的常规活动数据,包括首次就诊的估计人数,并辅以计划生育诊所调查的数据。结果表示为从全科医生和计划生育诊所获得避孕建议的16-49岁妇女的估计百分比。这些结果与综合住户调查结果的预期结果进行了比较。结果:1995/96年,在整个伦敦,12%的16-49岁女性从计划生育诊所获得避孕服务,24%的女性从全科医生那里获得避孕服务。在行政区一级,计划生育诊所的覆盖率从11%到25%不等,全科医生的覆盖率从11%到41%不等。估计该年龄组妇女不使用nhs提供的医疗或手术避孕措施的比例在0%至30%之间。在所有行政区,全科医生活动水平和计划生育诊所活动之间没有一致的关系。结论:结果表明,各区之间使用国家卫生服务提供的医疗或手术避孕方法的妇女比例有很大差异。计划生育诊所的活动与一般做法的活动之间没有任何明确的反比关系,这表明其中一种活动的变化不会因另一种活动的变化而得到补偿。更具体地说,选择购买较低水平的计划生育诊所活动的卫生当局不能假设妇女可以选择使用全科医生作为替代方案。这样的策略可能会增加这样的可能性,即本来打算使用计划生育诊所服务的妇女要么根本不使用避孕措施,要么使用效果较差的“非处方”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of patient-collected vulval swabs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning clinic: a pilot study. An interface of chlamydia testing by community family planning clinics and referral to hospital genitourinary medicine clinics. An exploratory study of information-giving used to promote chlamydial test-seeking by students at a college family planning clinic. News online Concepts of compliance: understandings and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1