Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194814
H McClean, J Sutherland, S Searle, P Howarth
Partnership working, involving workers in various aspects of sexual health and a large UK further education college, took place to give information about genital tract chlamydial infection in order to promote chlamydial urine testing (LC(x) Chlamydia trachomatis Assay Abbott Diagnosis Division) for a limited period at the college's family planning clinic. Female students were more likely to report awareness about the availability of testing and to access the testing service. Uptake of testing was largely contemporaneous with information-giving work and sharply declined after information-giving had ceased. A small population of test seekers (including partners of index cases) was generated, which harvested a rate of genital tract chlamydial infection similar to that found in family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics.
{"title":"An exploratory study of information-giving used to promote chlamydial test-seeking by students at a college family planning clinic.","authors":"H McClean, J Sutherland, S Searle, P Howarth","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partnership working, involving workers in various aspects of sexual health and a large UK further education college, took place to give information about genital tract chlamydial infection in order to promote chlamydial urine testing (LC(x) Chlamydia trachomatis Assay Abbott Diagnosis Division) for a limited period at the college's family planning clinic. Female students were more likely to report awareness about the availability of testing and to access the testing service. Uptake of testing was largely contemporaneous with information-giving work and sharply declined after information-giving had ceased. A small population of test seekers (including partners of index cases) was generated, which harvested a rate of genital tract chlamydial infection similar to that found in family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"209-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194814","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194643
E Turner, P Bowie, K W McMullen, C Kellock
This study was undertaken to determine local GPs' current management of menorrhagia, prior to the release of the Royal College of Obs tetricians and Gynaecologists' (RCOG) guideline on the initial management of menorrhagia. A postal questionnaire was sent to 204 GPs in the Forth Valley area. An 84% (n = 173) response rate was recorded. Responses were compared with RCOG guideline recommendations after its release. Fifty-two percent of respondents measured a full blood count and 56% performed a pelvic examination. Two thirds of GPs chose the recommended treatments (mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid) as their first or second choice of treatment in women not requiring contraception. One third chose cyclical progestogens. Only 10% of GPs selected an ineffective treatment (cyclical progestogens) as their first or second choice of treatment in women requiring contraception. This survey demonstrates that the majority of GPs are already prescribing the treatments recommended in the RCOG guidelines. There is a need for education amongst a minority to improve their practice. Half of the GPs reported compliance with the recommended investigations of full blood count and pelvic examination. The point at which these investigations are performed in the initial management of menorrhagia may need further discussion between primary and secondary care clinicians to clarify their purpose.
{"title":"First-line management of menorrhagia: findings from a survey of general practitioners in Forth Valley.","authors":"E Turner, P Bowie, K W McMullen, C Kellock","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken to determine local GPs' current management of menorrhagia, prior to the release of the Royal College of Obs tetricians and Gynaecologists' (RCOG) guideline on the initial management of menorrhagia. A postal questionnaire was sent to 204 GPs in the Forth Valley area. An 84% (n = 173) response rate was recorded. Responses were compared with RCOG guideline recommendations after its release. Fifty-two percent of respondents measured a full blood count and 56% performed a pelvic examination. Two thirds of GPs chose the recommended treatments (mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid) as their first or second choice of treatment in women not requiring contraception. One third chose cyclical progestogens. Only 10% of GPs selected an ineffective treatment (cyclical progestogens) as their first or second choice of treatment in women requiring contraception. This survey demonstrates that the majority of GPs are already prescribing the treatments recommended in the RCOG guidelines. There is a need for education amongst a minority to improve their practice. Half of the GPs reported compliance with the recommended investigations of full blood count and pelvic examination. The point at which these investigations are performed in the initial management of menorrhagia may need further discussion between primary and secondary care clinicians to clarify their purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"227-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194643","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194760
{"title":"Answer Sheet","authors":"","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194760","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"130 1","pages":"247 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77205752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From the journals","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"243-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"News Online","authors":"Spreety Tv","doi":"10.4016/28246.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4016/28246.01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"1 1","pages":"219 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88946674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"News online","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194823
J F Playle
This paper will take a critical look at the concepts of compliance and non-compliance, both generally and in the specific context of contraceptive use.
本文将对遵守和不遵守的概念进行批判性的审视,无论是在一般情况下还是在使用避孕药具的具体情况下。
{"title":"Concepts of compliance: understandings and approaches.","authors":"J F Playle","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper will take a critical look at the concepts of compliance and non-compliance, both generally and in the specific context of contraceptive use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"213-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194823","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194625
M Jones
The idea of providing family planning and genitourinary medicine under one roof has attracted much interest. The development of an integrated sexual health clinic in Eastbourne is described, from initial discussions between disparate parties to the emergence of a one-stop-shop, with a look to the future.
{"title":"Integrating family planning with genitourinary medicine: developing an holistic sexual health clinic in Eastbourne.","authors":"M Jones","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194625","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The idea of providing family planning and genitourinary medicine under one roof has attracted much interest. The development of an integrated sexual health clinic in Eastbourne is described, from initial discussions between disparate parties to the emergence of a one-stop-shop, with a look to the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"221-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194625","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194634
G H Hall, K A Guthrie, L W Turnbull
We report here two cases which illustrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the Mirena levonorgestrel releasing intra-uterine system and the GyneFix copper intra-uterine contraceptive implant. The MRI appearance of these devices has not to our knowledge been reported to date, and as increasing numbers of women choose to use these devices for treatment of gynaecological conditions and contraception, it becomes increasingly important to recognise their appearance on pelvic imaging.
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the Mirena and GyneFix intra-uterine contraceptive devices: a report of two cases.","authors":"G H Hall, K A Guthrie, L W Turnbull","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194634","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report here two cases which illustrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the Mirena levonorgestrel releasing intra-uterine system and the GyneFix copper intra-uterine contraceptive implant. The MRI appearance of these devices has not to our knowledge been reported to date, and as increasing numbers of women choose to use these devices for treatment of gynaecological conditions and contraception, it becomes increasingly important to recognise their appearance on pelvic imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"224-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194634","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2000-10-01DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194779
H Piercy, D Kellock, K Rogstad, E S Searle
The purpose of this study was to determine the level of awareness of genital Chlamydia infection and level of knowledge related to this infection in family planning (FP) clinic attenders. Clients attending FP clinics during a 3 month study period were invited to complete an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Five hundred and sixteen questionnaires from female attenders were analysed. Results showed that 54% of respondents had heard of Chlamydia. Subjective knowledge assessment for Chlamydia was low compared to that for other infections. Mean knowledge scores relating to genital chlamydial infection were low. There was no significant age-related trend in knowledge scores. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to increased Chlamydia screening activity in FP clinics.
{"title":"Knowledge of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in family planning clinic attenders.","authors":"H Piercy, D Kellock, K Rogstad, E S Searle","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the level of awareness of genital Chlamydia infection and level of knowledge related to this infection in family planning (FP) clinic attenders. Clients attending FP clinics during a 3 month study period were invited to complete an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Five hundred and sixteen questionnaires from female attenders were analysed. Results showed that 54% of respondents had heard of Chlamydia. Subjective knowledge assessment for Chlamydia was low compared to that for other infections. Mean knowledge scores relating to genital chlamydial infection were low. There was no significant age-related trend in knowledge scores. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to increased Chlamydia screening activity in FP clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"195-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194779","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21882598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}