Effects of oxytocin and an oxytocin receptor antagonist on retention of a nose-poke habituation response in mice.

M M Boccia, C M Baratti
{"title":"Effects of oxytocin and an oxytocin receptor antagonist on retention of a nose-poke habituation response in mice.","authors":"M M Boccia,&nbsp;C M Baratti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study describes the use of nose-poke habituation as a memory task in mice and demonstrates that it is sensitive to oxytocin (OT) and an oxytocin receptor antagonist (AOT) administered after the learning trial. Habituation of nose-poke behavior of mice was defined as a reduction in number of nose-pokes compared to baseline, and was measured in a hole-board apparatus to which male Swiss mice were exposed on two consecutive days for 5 min, respectively. Immediate post-training subcutaneous administration of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) impaired retention performance, whereas AOT (0.20 microgram/kg) enhanced it. Neither the impairing effects of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) nor the enhancing effects of AOT (0.20 microgram/kg) were seen when the training treatment interval was 180 min, suggesting that both treatments influenced the storage of recently acquired information. The effects of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) on retention were prevented by AOT (0.02 microgram/kg) administered immediately after training but 10 min prior OT treatment. This dose of antagonist did not affect retention by itself which suggest that impairing effects of OT on retention are probably due to an interaction of the neuropeptide with specific receptors. The actions of OT and AOT on retention were not due to enduring proactive effects of the compounds on performance during the retention test, since when given to untrained mice did not modify their spontaneous activities in the hole-board when recorded 24 h later. We suggest that nose-poke habituation learning can be a suitable method to investigate the mnestic effects of drugs, and that oxytocin negatively modulates memory storage of this form of learning elicited by stimuli repeatedly presented without reinforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7148,"journal":{"name":"Acta physiologica, pharmacologica et therapeutica latinoamericana : organo de la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Ciencias Fisiologicas y [de] la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Farmacologia","volume":"49 3","pages":"155-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta physiologica, pharmacologica et therapeutica latinoamericana : organo de la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Ciencias Fisiologicas y [de] la Asociacion Latinoamericana de Farmacologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study describes the use of nose-poke habituation as a memory task in mice and demonstrates that it is sensitive to oxytocin (OT) and an oxytocin receptor antagonist (AOT) administered after the learning trial. Habituation of nose-poke behavior of mice was defined as a reduction in number of nose-pokes compared to baseline, and was measured in a hole-board apparatus to which male Swiss mice were exposed on two consecutive days for 5 min, respectively. Immediate post-training subcutaneous administration of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) impaired retention performance, whereas AOT (0.20 microgram/kg) enhanced it. Neither the impairing effects of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) nor the enhancing effects of AOT (0.20 microgram/kg) were seen when the training treatment interval was 180 min, suggesting that both treatments influenced the storage of recently acquired information. The effects of OT (2.00 micrograms/kg) on retention were prevented by AOT (0.02 microgram/kg) administered immediately after training but 10 min prior OT treatment. This dose of antagonist did not affect retention by itself which suggest that impairing effects of OT on retention are probably due to an interaction of the neuropeptide with specific receptors. The actions of OT and AOT on retention were not due to enduring proactive effects of the compounds on performance during the retention test, since when given to untrained mice did not modify their spontaneous activities in the hole-board when recorded 24 h later. We suggest that nose-poke habituation learning can be a suitable method to investigate the mnestic effects of drugs, and that oxytocin negatively modulates memory storage of this form of learning elicited by stimuli repeatedly presented without reinforcement.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催产素和催产素受体拮抗剂对小鼠戳鼻习惯反应保留的影响。
本研究描述了在小鼠中使用戳鼻子习惯作为记忆任务,并证明它对学习试验后给予的催产素(OT)和催产素受体拮抗剂(AOT)敏感。小鼠戳鼻子行为的习惯化被定义为与基线相比戳鼻子次数的减少,并在孔板装置中进行测量,雄性瑞士小鼠连续两天分别暴露在孔板装置中5分钟。训练后立即皮下给予OT(2.00微克/公斤)会损害潴留性能,而AOT(0.20微克/公斤)会增强潴留性能。当训练间隔为180 min时,OT(2.00微克/千克)和AOT(0.20微克/千克)均未出现损伤作用,表明两种处理都影响了新获得信息的存储。OT(2.00微克/公斤)对潴留的影响可以通过训练后立即给予但在OT治疗前10分钟给予的AOT(0.02微克/公斤)来预防。这种剂量的拮抗剂本身不影响滞留,这表明OT对滞留的损害作用可能是由于神经肽与特定受体的相互作用。OT和AOT对滞留的作用不是由于化合物在滞留测试期间对表现的持久主动影响,因为当给予未经训练的小鼠24小时后记录时,它们在孔板上的自发活动没有改变。我们认为,戳鼻子习惯性学习可以作为一种合适的方法来研究药物的遗忘效应,并且催产素可以负向调节这种由反复呈现而没有强化的刺激引起的学习形式的记忆储存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of calcium deficiency on acyl-CoA synthetase activity in microsomes from various rat tissues. Influence of moderate cooling (37 degrees C-25 degrees C) on the reactivity of isolated rat tail artery. [Hemorrhagic, edema-forming, proteolytic and myonecrotic activities of viper venoms of Bothrops alternatus (Vibora de la Cruz)]. Effects of oxytocin and an oxytocin receptor antagonist on retention of a nose-poke habituation response in mice. Antispasmodic action of propinox on the isolated human gallbladder: possible mechanism of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1