Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis for hip fractures. A clinical multicentre study in Finland.

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Pub Date : 2000-01-01
P Lüthje, I Nurmi, H Aho, P Honkanen, P Jokipii, M Kataja, J Kytõmaa, J Nirhamo, A Pekkanen, J Rimpiläinen, R Sihvonen, I Sinisaari, I Tulikoura, V Valtonen
{"title":"Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis for hip fractures. A clinical multicentre study in Finland.","authors":"P Lüthje,&nbsp;I Nurmi,&nbsp;H Aho,&nbsp;P Honkanen,&nbsp;P Jokipii,&nbsp;M Kataja,&nbsp;J Kytõmaa,&nbsp;J Nirhamo,&nbsp;A Pekkanen,&nbsp;J Rimpiläinen,&nbsp;R Sihvonen,&nbsp;I Sinisaari,&nbsp;I Tulikoura,&nbsp;V Valtonen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in open reduction and osteosynthesis of closed hip fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis of these fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 224 patients operated on between November 1994 and February 1998 in six hospitals by internal fixation for a fresh hip fracture were prospectively and randomly allocated to either a ceftriaxone antibiotic prophylaxis or no prophylaxis group and followed for one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 6 weeks after the operation, 2.6% wound infections were recorded in the antibiotic group and 4.7% in the control group. Two (1.9%) of the five infections in the control group were deep infections (both sensitive to ceftriaxone). There were no statistically significant differences between the infection rates in both groups. However, when analyzing all complications recorded within 6 weeks, significantly more complications were found in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis the most important factor predicting postoperative complications was the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study the antibiotic prophylaxis group had significantly less postoperative complications than the control group within 6 weeks after the operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75495,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","volume":"89 2","pages":"125-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in open reduction and osteosynthesis of closed hip fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis of these fractures.

Material and methods: A total of 224 patients operated on between November 1994 and February 1998 in six hospitals by internal fixation for a fresh hip fracture were prospectively and randomly allocated to either a ceftriaxone antibiotic prophylaxis or no prophylaxis group and followed for one year.

Results: Within 6 weeks after the operation, 2.6% wound infections were recorded in the antibiotic group and 4.7% in the control group. Two (1.9%) of the five infections in the control group were deep infections (both sensitive to ceftriaxone). There were no statistically significant differences between the infection rates in both groups. However, when analyzing all complications recorded within 6 weeks, significantly more complications were found in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis the most important factor predicting postoperative complications was the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Conclusion: In this study the antibiotic prophylaxis group had significantly less postoperative complications than the control group within 6 weeks after the operation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单剂量抗生素预防髋部骨折植骨术。芬兰一项临床多中心研究。
背景与目的:抗生素预防在闭合性髋部骨折切开复位和植骨术中的应用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是为了证明抗生素预防在这些骨折的植骨术中的作用。材料与方法:对1994年11月至1998年2月在6家医院接受髋部骨折内固定手术的224例患者进行前瞻性随机分组,分为头孢曲松抗生素预防组和无预防组,随访1年。结果:术后6周内,抗生素组创面感染率为2.6%,对照组创面感染率为4.7%。对照组5例感染中2例(1.9%)为深部感染(均对头孢曲松敏感)。两组感染率无统计学差异。然而,在分析6周内记录的所有并发症时,对照组的并发症明显多于对照组(p < 0.01)。在多变量分析中,预测术后并发症的最重要因素是缺乏抗生素预防。结论:本研究中抗生素预防组术后6周内并发症明显少于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic Lymphoma Toe-to-Hand Transfer Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases Blood, sweat and tears.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1