Repeated use of hormonal emergency contraception by younger women in the UK.

S Rowlands, H Devalia, R Lawrenson, J Logie, B Ineichen
{"title":"Repeated use of hormonal emergency contraception by younger women in the UK.","authors":"S Rowlands,&nbsp;H Devalia,&nbsp;R Lawrenson,&nbsp;J Logie,&nbsp;B Ineichen","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A cohort of women aged 14-29 in 1993 was identified from the General Practice Research Database and followed up for a period of 4 years. Patient files were searched for evidence of use of emergency contraception and regular contraception. Of the 95 007 women, 15 105 (16%) had received emergency contraception during the study period (an average of 5% per annum). There was a small year on year increase in uptake of emergency contraception between 1994 and 1997. Only 4% of emergency contraception users received emergency contraception more than twice in any year. More than 70% of those who had no previous record of use of regular contraception had used regular contraception within 1 year of using emergency contraception. Teenagers were more likely than other age groups to use emergency contraception, to be repeat users of emergency contraception and to fail to start regular contraception after first use of emergency contraception until later in the study period. These results disprove the notion of widespread repeated use of emergency contraception. They show that provision of an emergency contraception service does not result in failure to initiate regular contraception or abandonment of regular contraception; rather they show many women using regular contraception for the first time after use of emergency contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 3","pages":"138-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194562","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of family planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

A cohort of women aged 14-29 in 1993 was identified from the General Practice Research Database and followed up for a period of 4 years. Patient files were searched for evidence of use of emergency contraception and regular contraception. Of the 95 007 women, 15 105 (16%) had received emergency contraception during the study period (an average of 5% per annum). There was a small year on year increase in uptake of emergency contraception between 1994 and 1997. Only 4% of emergency contraception users received emergency contraception more than twice in any year. More than 70% of those who had no previous record of use of regular contraception had used regular contraception within 1 year of using emergency contraception. Teenagers were more likely than other age groups to use emergency contraception, to be repeat users of emergency contraception and to fail to start regular contraception after first use of emergency contraception until later in the study period. These results disprove the notion of widespread repeated use of emergency contraception. They show that provision of an emergency contraception service does not result in failure to initiate regular contraception or abandonment of regular contraception; rather they show many women using regular contraception for the first time after use of emergency contraception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国,年轻女性反复使用激素紧急避孕。
1993年从一般实践研究数据库中确定了一组14-29岁的妇女,并进行了4年的随访。检索患者档案,寻找使用紧急避孕和常规避孕的证据。在95007名妇女中,15105名(16%)在研究期间接受了紧急避孕(平均每年5%)。1994年至1997年期间,采取紧急避孕措施的人数逐年小幅增加。只有4%的紧急避孕药使用者在任何一年接受了两次以上的紧急避孕药。在没有常规避孕记录的患者中,超过70%的人在使用紧急避孕后1年内使用了常规避孕。与其他年龄组相比,青少年更有可能使用紧急避孕措施,反复使用紧急避孕措施,并且在首次使用紧急避孕措施后直到研究期间后期才开始定期避孕。这些结果反驳了普遍重复使用紧急避孕的观点。它们表明,提供紧急避孕服务不会导致不能开始常规避孕或放弃常规避孕;相反,它们显示了许多妇女在使用紧急避孕措施后第一次使用常规避孕措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of patient-collected vulval swabs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning clinic: a pilot study. An interface of chlamydia testing by community family planning clinics and referral to hospital genitourinary medicine clinics. An exploratory study of information-giving used to promote chlamydial test-seeking by students at a college family planning clinic. News online Concepts of compliance: understandings and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1