Randomized field experiments for program planning, development, and evaluation: an illustrative bibliography.

R F Boruch, A J Mcsweeny, E J Soderstrom
{"title":"Randomized field experiments for program planning, development, and evaluation: an illustrative bibliography.","authors":"R F Boruch,&nbsp;A J Mcsweeny,&nbsp;E J Soderstrom","doi":"10.1177/0193841x7800200411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This bibliography lists references to over 300 field experiments undertaken in schools, hospitals, prisons, and other social settings, mainly in the U.S. The list is divided into 10 major categories corresponding to the type of program under examination. They include: criminal and civil justice programs, mental health, training and education, mass media, information collection, utilization, commerce and industry, welfare, health, and family planning. The main purpose of the bibliography is to provide evidence on feasibility and scope of randomized field tests, since despite their advantages, it is not always clear from managerial, political, and other constraints on research that they can be mounted. Dates of publications range from 1944 to 1978.</p>","PeriodicalId":84714,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation quarterly","volume":"2 4","pages":"655-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0193841x7800200411","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x7800200411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

This bibliography lists references to over 300 field experiments undertaken in schools, hospitals, prisons, and other social settings, mainly in the U.S. The list is divided into 10 major categories corresponding to the type of program under examination. They include: criminal and civil justice programs, mental health, training and education, mass media, information collection, utilization, commerce and industry, welfare, health, and family planning. The main purpose of the bibliography is to provide evidence on feasibility and scope of randomized field tests, since despite their advantages, it is not always clear from managerial, political, and other constraints on research that they can be mounted. Dates of publications range from 1944 to 1978.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机实地实验计划,发展和评价:说明性参考书目。
该参考书目列出了在学校、医院、监狱和其他社会环境中进行的300多个实地实验的参考资料,主要在美国。该清单根据所审查的项目类型分为10个主要类别。它们包括:刑事和民事司法程序、心理健康、培训和教育、大众传媒、信息收集和利用、商业和工业、福利、卫生和计划生育。参考书目的主要目的是提供关于随机实地试验的可行性和范围的证据,因为尽管随机实地试验有优点,但从管理、政治和其他限制研究的因素来看,并不总是清楚地表明它们可以进行。出版日期从1944年到1978年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of rural health care research. Impact evaluation of service programs: three flexible designs. Randomized field experiments for program planning, development, and evaluation: an illustrative bibliography. Estimating family planning program effects on U.S. fertility rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1