[Spermiologic parameters in Czech men from 1950 to 1984 (analysis of data from the archives of the Sexology Institute of the First Medical School of Charles University and the General Medical School Hospital in Prague].

Sbornik lekarsky Pub Date : 2002-01-01
J Zvĕrina, V Urbánek, J Cirýn
{"title":"[Spermiologic parameters in Czech men from 1950 to 1984 (analysis of data from the archives of the Sexology Institute of the First Medical School of Charles University and the General Medical School Hospital in Prague].","authors":"J Zvĕrina,&nbsp;V Urbánek,&nbsp;J Cirýn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports maintaining that sperm concentration in male ejaculates had decreased markedly over the past decades captured mind-share all over the world. However, literary data diverge about such a lasting trend. Our objective has been to contribute to the ongoing debate by presenting results of our own research. We have studied semen analyses of 5,363 men who had been tested at an outpatient care unit of the Prague Institute of Sexology between 1950 and 1984. These semen analyses measured volume of the ejaculate, sperm concentration, sperm motility, and a share of sperms with morphological abnormalities. None of these values showed statistically significant deterioration among seven groups of patients, each spanning five years. Therefore, our data did not confirm the above-mentioned lasting trend in semen analysis values. Research teams from all over the world have recently attracted a lot of attention by reporting a no-table decrease over the past decades in sperm concentration in the male ejaculates. However, literary data diverge about such a lasting trend. Our objective has been to contribute to the ongoing debate by presenting results of our own research. We have analysed semen tests filed in the archives of the Institute of Sexology at the 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University. We have studied a set of 5,363 men who had undergone their first sperm analysis between 1950 and 1984. We have gathered our data from medical records, using a uniform pattern of investigation. The set was divided into seven five-year groups based on the year of the first analysis. Volume of the ejaculate: The groups showed the following average volume of the ejaculate: 3.9-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.7-3.7 (ml). Neither the distribution nor the mean value of this variable has changed much over time. Sperm concentration: The groups showed the following mean sperm concentration: 32.9-42.3-56.2-57.9-72.2-70.8-72.3 (million per ml). It is obvious from these results that the mean sperm concentration increased over time in our set. Sperm motility: The groups showed the following mean sperm motility: 34.7-46.4-53.3-57.7-59.6-58.5-58.2 (per cent). Sperm morphology: The share of ejaculates with a high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm cells has not grown much. Our data did not confirm the hypothesis that sperm analysis results have been gradually worsening. We have not found deteriorating trends in any of the sperm quality measures in the five-year intervals between 1950 and 1984. Although our results cannot close the debate about purported deterioration of sperm analysis results, they seem to indicate that we should take reports of universal decrease in sperm concentration in the seminal fluid with a grain of salt.</p>","PeriodicalId":76514,"journal":{"name":"Sbornik lekarsky","volume":"103 1","pages":"35-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sbornik lekarsky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports maintaining that sperm concentration in male ejaculates had decreased markedly over the past decades captured mind-share all over the world. However, literary data diverge about such a lasting trend. Our objective has been to contribute to the ongoing debate by presenting results of our own research. We have studied semen analyses of 5,363 men who had been tested at an outpatient care unit of the Prague Institute of Sexology between 1950 and 1984. These semen analyses measured volume of the ejaculate, sperm concentration, sperm motility, and a share of sperms with morphological abnormalities. None of these values showed statistically significant deterioration among seven groups of patients, each spanning five years. Therefore, our data did not confirm the above-mentioned lasting trend in semen analysis values. Research teams from all over the world have recently attracted a lot of attention by reporting a no-table decrease over the past decades in sperm concentration in the male ejaculates. However, literary data diverge about such a lasting trend. Our objective has been to contribute to the ongoing debate by presenting results of our own research. We have analysed semen tests filed in the archives of the Institute of Sexology at the 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University. We have studied a set of 5,363 men who had undergone their first sperm analysis between 1950 and 1984. We have gathered our data from medical records, using a uniform pattern of investigation. The set was divided into seven five-year groups based on the year of the first analysis. Volume of the ejaculate: The groups showed the following average volume of the ejaculate: 3.9-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.7-3.7 (ml). Neither the distribution nor the mean value of this variable has changed much over time. Sperm concentration: The groups showed the following mean sperm concentration: 32.9-42.3-56.2-57.9-72.2-70.8-72.3 (million per ml). It is obvious from these results that the mean sperm concentration increased over time in our set. Sperm motility: The groups showed the following mean sperm motility: 34.7-46.4-53.3-57.7-59.6-58.5-58.2 (per cent). Sperm morphology: The share of ejaculates with a high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm cells has not grown much. Our data did not confirm the hypothesis that sperm analysis results have been gradually worsening. We have not found deteriorating trends in any of the sperm quality measures in the five-year intervals between 1950 and 1984. Although our results cannot close the debate about purported deterioration of sperm analysis results, they seem to indicate that we should take reports of universal decrease in sperm concentration in the seminal fluid with a grain of salt.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[1950年至1984年捷克男性的精子学参数(对查尔斯大学第一医学院性学研究所和布拉格综合医学院医院档案数据的分析]。
有报道称,在过去的几十年里,男性射精中的精子浓度显著下降,这引起了全世界的关注。然而,文学资料对这种持久的趋势存在分歧。我们的目标是通过展示我们自己的研究结果,为正在进行的辩论做出贡献。我们研究了5363名男性的精液分析,他们在1950年至1984年间在布拉格性学研究所的门诊护理部门接受了检测。这些精液分析测量了射精量、精子浓度、精子活力和形态异常精子的比例。在七组患者中,这些数值均未显示统计学上显著的恶化,每组跨越五年。因此,我们的数据并不能证实上述精液分析值的持续趋势。来自世界各地的研究团队最近报道了过去几十年来男性射精中精子浓度的无表下降,引起了很多关注。然而,文学资料对这种持久的趋势存在分歧。我们的目标是通过展示我们自己的研究结果,为正在进行的辩论做出贡献。我们分析了查尔斯大学第一医学院性学研究所档案中的精液测试。我们研究了5363名男性,他们在1950年至1984年间接受了第一次精子分析。我们从医疗记录中收集数据,采用统一的调查模式。根据第一次分析的年份,这组数据被分为七个五年组。射精体积:各组平均射精体积:3.9-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.8-3.7-3.7 (ml)。随着时间的推移,该变量的分布和均值都没有太大变化。精子浓度:各组平均精子浓度:32.9-42.3-56.2-57.9-72.2-70.8-72.3(百万/ ml)。从这些结果可以明显看出,在我们的研究中,平均精子浓度随着时间的推移而增加。精子活力:各组平均精子活力:34.7-46.4-53.3-57.7-59.6-58.5- 58.2%。精子形态:具有高比例形态异常精子细胞的射精的比例并没有增长太多。我们的数据并没有证实精子分析结果逐渐恶化的假设。在1950年至1984年的5年间,我们没有发现任何精子质量测量的恶化趋势。虽然我们的结果不能结束关于精子分析结果变差的争论,但它们似乎表明,我们应该对精液中精子浓度普遍下降的报道持保留态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching Czech to the international medical students: teamwork approach. [Acute phase proteins in female patients with breast carcinoma]. [Effect of parathormone on bone blood flow in rats--possible role of NO]. Image analysis of blood platelets adhesion. Hemostyptic effect of oxidized cellulose on blood platelets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1