Building the airplane in flight: an auditing approach to quality management system development.

M C Burson
{"title":"Building the airplane in flight: an auditing approach to quality management system development.","authors":"M C Burson","doi":"10.1080/713844025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In June of 2000, Maine DEP (in company with the other five New England states) found itself under EPA pressure to develop and document a quality management system by the end of the calendar year. In the frenzy that followed, the Department decided to use a private sector model for system development that called for a prospectively-focused QM plan that would be implemented through formal auditing. That is, instead of trying in advance to identify all the deficits in departmental quality management, and then assigning individuals and task groups to create structures to fill the gaps, Maine's QMP specifies the future desired system in broad terms. ME-DEP then uses its own cadre of trained auditors to assess current practice against the \"condition expected\" in the QMP, knowing that in many cases basic quality management practices will need to be developed. This approach assists program managers, particularly (but not exclusively) in areas sensitive to environmental data standards, in creating systems and practices that are rooted in reality, and that are perceived to add value to the Department's core work instead of just additional paperwork. Audit reports create a continuous feedback loop assuring that written procedures document actual operations. Finally, the results of auditing identify areas in which the QM system (and its plan) should be elaborated or refined, which leads to an iterative process by which quality approaches are infused in all areas of DEP operations. In the twelve months following EPA-Region I's initial approval of Maine's QMP, a total of seven audits were completed at various program levels, including two focused on critical QMP elements: Documents and Records; and Computer Hardware/Software. This paper will briefly describe the background and implementation of this approach; identify some of the factors which led to success; and describe, using selected examples, some of the early outcomes of the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"137-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/713844025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/713844025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In June of 2000, Maine DEP (in company with the other five New England states) found itself under EPA pressure to develop and document a quality management system by the end of the calendar year. In the frenzy that followed, the Department decided to use a private sector model for system development that called for a prospectively-focused QM plan that would be implemented through formal auditing. That is, instead of trying in advance to identify all the deficits in departmental quality management, and then assigning individuals and task groups to create structures to fill the gaps, Maine's QMP specifies the future desired system in broad terms. ME-DEP then uses its own cadre of trained auditors to assess current practice against the "condition expected" in the QMP, knowing that in many cases basic quality management practices will need to be developed. This approach assists program managers, particularly (but not exclusively) in areas sensitive to environmental data standards, in creating systems and practices that are rooted in reality, and that are perceived to add value to the Department's core work instead of just additional paperwork. Audit reports create a continuous feedback loop assuring that written procedures document actual operations. Finally, the results of auditing identify areas in which the QM system (and its plan) should be elaborated or refined, which leads to an iterative process by which quality approaches are infused in all areas of DEP operations. In the twelve months following EPA-Region I's initial approval of Maine's QMP, a total of seven audits were completed at various program levels, including two focused on critical QMP elements: Documents and Records; and Computer Hardware/Software. This paper will briefly describe the background and implementation of this approach; identify some of the factors which led to success; and describe, using selected examples, some of the early outcomes of the program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建造飞行中的飞机:质量管理体系开发的审核方法。
2000年6月,缅因州环境保护局(与其他五个新英格兰州一起)发现自己在环境保护局的压力下,必须在日历年年底前制定并记录一套质量管理体系。在随后的狂热中,该部门决定使用私营部门模型进行系统开发,该模型要求通过正式审计来实施以前瞻性为重点的质量管理计划。也就是说,缅因州的质量管理计划不是试图事先确定部门质量管理中的所有缺陷,然后分配个人和任务小组创建结构来填补空白,而是从广义上规定了未来期望的系统。ME-DEP随后使用其训练有素的审核员骨干,根据质量管理计划中的“预期条件”评估当前的实践,知道在许多情况下需要开发基本的质量管理实践。这种方法帮助项目经理,特别是(但不限于)在环境数据标准敏感的领域,创建植根于现实的系统和实践,并被认为是为部门的核心工作增加价值,而不仅仅是额外的文书工作。审计报告创建了一个持续的反馈循环,确保书面程序记录了实际操作。最后,审计的结果确定了质量管理系统(及其计划)应该被详细阐述或改进的领域,这导致了一个迭代过程,通过这个过程,质量方法被注入到DEP操作的所有领域。在环保局一区首次批准缅因州质量管理体系后的12个月里,在各个项目层面共完成了7次审核,其中两次重点关注质量管理体系的关键要素:文件和记录;和计算机硬件/软件。本文将简要介绍该方法的背景和实现;找出导致成功的一些因素;并使用选定的例子描述该计划的一些早期成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Establishing tolerance levels for customer complaints. Major issues in quality assessment and improvement of clinical hyperbaric services: an international perspective. The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come? Evaluation of customer satisfaction level of different projects. Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1