Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia

Bernhard Rosengarten, Annette Spiller, Christine Aldinger, Manfred Kaps
{"title":"Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia","authors":"Bernhard Rosengarten,&nbsp;Annette Spiller,&nbsp;Christine Aldinger,&nbsp;Manfred Kaps","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00070-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> Among other factors, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) is regulated in accordance to the arterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension and the cortical activity. The CO<sub>2</sub> test is commonly used to measure the vascular reserve capacity. Most functional imaging studies rely on the activity-flow coupling (AFC). We aimed to combine both challenges in order to increase the insight into mechanisms of CBF regulation. <em>Methods:</em><span> Fifteen healthy students underwent a functional transcranial Doppler test using a visual stimulation paradigm: firstly under normocapnia and secondly under conditions of hypercapnia. Hypercapnia was induced by breathing a carbogene gas mixture of 5% CO</span><sub>2</sub> and 95% O<sub>2</sub>. The entire time course of flow velocity adaptation in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) was analyzed mathematically using a control system approach. <em>Results:</em><span> Resting CBF velocities increased by nearly 26% under conditions of hypercapnia, whereas the slight increase in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and the decrease in the Pourcelot–Pulsatility index (PI) were statistically not significant. From the control system parameters which were time delay, rate time, gain, attenuation and natural frequency, only the parameter rate time, indicative for the initial steepness of flow velocity increase, showed a statistically significant decrease, consistently for the peak systolic and enddiastolic flow velocity data. As concluded from the unchanged gain parameter the absolute amount of blood flow evoked by the same visual stimulus increased also by 26%. </span><em>Conclusion:</em> Evaluated by Doppler measurements hypercapnia seems to influence the AFC in two ways: It decreases the steepness of the initial increase in blood flow velocity and enhances the absolute amount of blood flow evoked by the same stimulus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 169-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00070-8","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective: Among other factors, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) is regulated in accordance to the arterial CO2 tension and the cortical activity. The CO2 test is commonly used to measure the vascular reserve capacity. Most functional imaging studies rely on the activity-flow coupling (AFC). We aimed to combine both challenges in order to increase the insight into mechanisms of CBF regulation. Methods: Fifteen healthy students underwent a functional transcranial Doppler test using a visual stimulation paradigm: firstly under normocapnia and secondly under conditions of hypercapnia. Hypercapnia was induced by breathing a carbogene gas mixture of 5% CO2 and 95% O2. The entire time course of flow velocity adaptation in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) was analyzed mathematically using a control system approach. Results: Resting CBF velocities increased by nearly 26% under conditions of hypercapnia, whereas the slight increase in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and the decrease in the Pourcelot–Pulsatility index (PI) were statistically not significant. From the control system parameters which were time delay, rate time, gain, attenuation and natural frequency, only the parameter rate time, indicative for the initial steepness of flow velocity increase, showed a statistically significant decrease, consistently for the peak systolic and enddiastolic flow velocity data. As concluded from the unchanged gain parameter the absolute amount of blood flow evoked by the same visual stimulus increased also by 26%. Conclusion: Evaluated by Doppler measurements hypercapnia seems to influence the AFC in two ways: It decreases the steepness of the initial increase in blood flow velocity and enhances the absolute amount of blood flow evoked by the same stimulus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常碳酸血症和高碳酸血症状态下视觉诱发血流量调节的控制系统分析
目的:脑血流(CBF)受动脉CO2浓度和皮层活动的影响。二氧化碳测试通常用于测量血管储备能力。大多数功能成像研究依赖于活动-流耦合(AFC)。我们的目标是将这两个挑战结合起来,以增加对CBF调节机制的了解。方法:15名健康学生分别在低碳酸血症和高碳酸血症条件下采用视觉刺激模式进行功能性经颅多普勒试验。高碳酸血症是通过呼吸5% CO2和95% O2的碳气混合物引起的。采用控制系统方法对脑后动脉血流速度适应的全过程进行了数学分析。结果:在高碳酸血症条件下,静息CBF速度增加了近26%,而动脉血压(ABP)的轻微升高和Pourcelot-Pulsatility指数(PI)的下降无统计学意义。从控制系统的时间延迟、速率时间、增益、衰减和固有频率参数来看,只有速率时间参数(表明流速的初始陡度增加)有统计学意义上的下降,与收缩期和舒张期峰值流速数据一致。在增益参数不变的情况下,同样的视觉刺激引起的绝对血流量也增加了26%。结论:经多普勒测量,高碳酸血症对AFC的影响主要表现在两方面:降低初始血流速度增加的陡度,提高同一刺激引起的绝对血流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound assessment of the intima and media layers on the carotid arteries in peri- and postmenopausal women Subject Index Author Index Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia Effect of hypertension and candesartan on the blood flow velocity of the extraocular vessels in hypertensive patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1